Draft20110629, Some Clues about the 1981 RAPC--Page 1

Date: 100/02/08 @ 11:23 To: Judicial Yuan
Name: David CK Chang
E-mail: chaokai_chang@hotmail.com
Telephone: 89529809
TITLE: Some clues about the 1981 RAPC(Risk Agreement of Possessed Child)--Page 1.
Content:
Dear Chief Justice Mr Hao-Ming Rai:

Last month(2011.1) the complaint letter documents sent to Judicial Yuan mentioned the 1981 ten-year-old child Mr David Chang with an illegal contract RAPC(Risk Agreement of Possessed Child), Mr David Chang went to City University of New York(CUNY) Baruch Business School in 1996 summer. Because the previous year on August 14, 1994 the USA sergeant Ms Eva Ivory dropped dead at Taipei City, the United Nations child abused case Mr David Chang was under heavy energy harassment to drop out of his graduate school study in New York on October 22, 1996. It was supposed to be the United Nations Human Rights Council serving as jury to the court reviewing Sgt Eva Ivory death case at Taipei City, which the jury mentioned the illegal contract RAPC document to the UN Abused Child Mr David Chang. The international student of CUNY public school Mr David Chang started to know who were harassing him, including the interests groups which were operating for decades at Taiwan for the American Reading Machine Membership Company(ARM-MC). These clues are detailed in the following:

The incumbent Kaohsiung City Mayor Ms Chen Chu in 1994 Taipei military exercise and weapon purchase show, in public argued with the former Legislator Mrs Wu Shu-Chen(anonymous message but mentioned she was the assistant of former legislator Mrs Wu Shu-Chen) that she was not lacking money to sign that military subsidy contract from Defense Department. Ms Chen Chu in 1994 also mentioned that she not only recruited members for the old machine from ARM(American Reading Machine company, which sold two machines to Mrs Lien Fang-Yu and Mrs Wu Shu-chen in 1970s) membership club for monthly membership fees collecting, but she also collected membership fees as personal commissions for another Japanese company from recruiting citizens of school age in Tainan and Kaohsiung areas of the newer prototype machines, therefore she was quite well-off economically. Ms Chen Chu was complaining to the former Legislator Mrs Wu Shu-chen for being declined the second term assistant fee payment on the fourth year of the six-year term legislator in 1990, resulting to her short of earnings of lacking such an assistant fee income. She had to sign the subsidy contract again from the National Defense Department to mend such an income loss in 1990. In 1994 Taipei online discussion, another character with online message was the former Texas Governor Mr George Bush Jr.(In 1994 Taipei online discussion Mr George Bush Jr. did not reveal his identity, but the Kuomintang(KMT) Youth Working Crew Chairman Dr Ma Ying-Jeou ever mentioned Mr George Bush Jr.'s USA official identity of intelligence working in (Mainland)China, and the complex between them during the 1978 US-ROC(Taiwan) rapprochement breach. Therefore, it was sort of an anonymous discussion but the identities of whom participated were known.) Mr George Bush Jr. was the Public Relationship Manager of ARM(American Reading Machine) company in 1970s, and Ms Chen Chu since National Cheng-chi University(NCCU) was cashier of that American company ARM(American Reading Machine) and also was Mr George Bush Jr.'s colleague. The purpose Mr Texas Governor George Bush Jr. participated the Taipei discussion via online message in 1994, as he explained, was that he wanted to show that he cared those children who were now graduated from universities and joined the Army, MP or Air Force for military service in Taiwan area. Mr George Bush Jr. said that these children paid a fee to the ARM-MC company in teenage to be the company's long-term customers, he as the company former employee was responsible for these children's well-beings, but was not having legal responsibilities by law, as he explained in 1994 online...

Best Regards,

David CK Chang,
Citizen of New Taipei City Panchiao District,
F121485303,SSN057864042,
February 8, 2011,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

Translated by DB, June 29, 2011, National Central Library, Taipei City

Dan Brown, Deception Point, SETl (1996 CUNY textbook)

Marjorie Tench was senior advisor of President Zach Herney.
She had a meeting with Senator Sedgewick Sexton prior CNN production, six miles away from President Zach Herney's television watching.

Senior advisor Ms. Tench speaks with Senator Mr. S. Sexton with NASA budget cut.
Ms. Tench argued that the administration had benefited from NASA special task and mentioned high-tech job loss and the SETI program against him.

Mr. Sexton persuaded the budget cut with job loss of no consequence contrast with American blue collar workers, and explained with pride to SETI, the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, was absymal money pit ever.
SETI, abbreviated from above instead of Satellites of Earth Topology Investigation.
"...if other governmental agency with $45 billion spent over 35 years had not produced a single result, they would have been axed a long time ago."
"The extraterrestrial life can not exist."

Ms. Tench asked Senator Mr. Sexton what if he would be wrong.
Mr. Sexton said, "I'll eat my hat."
Ms. Tench satisfied with this answer.
This was prior CNN production meeting.

(PS. this novel content of Dan Brown's Deception Point, ever appeared on the management textbook, Organizational Behavior Observer of 1996 City University of New York Baruch Business Graduate program, before DB dropped out the program on October 22, 1996.)

DB, SSN057864042,
June 9, 2011,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

南黛與桂琳的故事

南黛在1994年夏天升上大學四年級，在學院的分發實習前一年時，從南部的學院跟著來到台北，參加了民進黨的軍事開門活動，看到了穿著華麗艾森豪美軍制服的大衛，肩上閃亮的金條亮晶晶，在市郊偏遠的林口豪宅一帶的民防軍事徵員活動中，簽下了人生第一份軍事合約，是短期6個月的約，好幾萬塊新台幣的月入津貼還有簽約金，對於拮据大學生來說，也是解決人生問題的一筆經濟挹注。

桂琳在小學後跟著父親從宜蘭搬家到機場附近的空軍眷村，轉眼間從轉學到當地的私立的高中的國中部與高中畢業，考上了台北的私立大學，私立大學的學費其實是在姐姐留學美國之外，家庭支出與父親的收入中的重要負擔。民進黨在當年的軍事徵員其實還不像現在民眾會熱烈支持參與，除了民進黨在台北市議員的選舉號稱與安‧衛斯理女士的美國阿肯色州長選舉同期為美國對台灣民主進程實驗，台北市議員出身負責民進黨招募業務康郁慶立委心理其實很不是滋味，從宜蘭來台北的博士競選演講口才一流地主縣長阿德也有同樣的困擾。桂琳在這樣的條件下，從台北市的私立大學，以大學新生身份跟到郊區豪宅區的軍事觀摩活動，同樣也看到了穿著美麗的美軍艾森豪制服在唱著獨腳戲的大衛。桂琳當時本來要和一些鄉下來的阿公、阿嬤簽一個月的短期約，後來有富商來營的星探看上了她，勸她不要簽，只領取從市郊豪宅觀摩區到機場附近住家的車馬費，後來改報帳成從市郊豪宅觀摩區到台北市大學宿舍的車馬費，大概有五、六千塊新台幣，是民進黨國防業務費用統一支付的，支薪預算審核造冊應該是會和南黛的六個月的短期合約造冊在一起的，在當年造冊的名單上，應該是寥寥無幾的幾個人。

後來南黛找到大衛告訴他其實從很久以前就仰慕著他，其實桂琳也在大衛到紐約之前說溜嘴說過同樣的話；但是南黛說她知道大衛在紐約的事，是西洋鏡的技倆從山上知道的呢？還是南黛根本就在1996年夏天跟著康郁慶立委及康夫人一起到紐約市去？桂琳在1996年春天才認識大衛，在夏天的台北與紐約的電話熱線你和我已經相當熱絡了，在紐約的越洋電話中她告訴大衛，她受託拿物件到新加坡去給朋友，電話記錄中是新加坡嗎？印象中的桂琳是不會說謊的，只有談到她的父親時會美化做過度的讚美，應該不算是撒謊。只是她在春天時說溜嘴的話，算不算是掩蓋一些事實卻沒有誠實告知呢？大衛其實心理有著疑問的。紐約的學校方面告訴大衛懷疑他的身份造假，要求他出示出生證明，除了在大學的長春藤大學校長被解雇轉為軍職時用了化名外，是不是與民進黨有關係的南黛與桂琳在1996年夏天在紐約市的聯絡發生了問題，造成了這樣的困擾呢？

DB, June 23, 2011, ssn057864042, 小愛與小新 aiwa & sony

「說不」--比爾‧柯林頓傳Ch 32

Bill Clinton: An American Journey, Great Expectation, Nigel Hamilton, 2003, Random House
Chapter 32, 說不, Page 477, Page 478, Page 478, Page 479, Page 481

1. 那不是,貝茜‧萊特，後來回憶起來，名單上支付給精心計畫的柯林頓議程(agenda, 時間表)。

2. 那是貝茜對嗎？只有比爾和希拉蕊能了解他們自己的心(愛人)的深度(depth of their own hearts)，以及企圖心(and ambitions)。

3. 因為貝茜‧萊特之前似乎看起來很明顯的事實，雖然極為誘人的，是這樣突來的總統參選機會(是柯林頓)必須要去拒絕的...『我說，「你不知道啊，比爾！第一，你告訴我你不(知道)她在哪，所以你不知道她極需用錢或知道其他任何事！你並沒有控制她要說什麼或不說什麼的權力，一個(權力)都沒有(none)。」』

4. 小岩城的州議會，就算安‧亨利也知道與接受了的事情，議會裏並不是擠滿老好男孩，而卻是老壞男孩與女孩。安嘆息的回想：「當[我先生]莫理思在[州]參議院時，認識了很多人，那是我們一輩子都認識的人...」...為什麼，這樣說來，他必須對想當總統的欲求說不，比爾猜想著，只是因為他不對婚外性行為說不--通常是那些女人的性慾而發生性行為，而不是他自己的性慾需求？安‧亨利當然責備那些女人，就像怪她自己是弱者州長那樣。「...他是有吸引力的男人，我以前自己從未被吸引過(had never been attracted), 我只是說很明顯地有許多人發現他有吸引力。」...新聞媒體從來就知道性的報導會使報紙大賣，還有電視的收視率...尋找候選人的小錯誤提振媒體的銷售業績，但是卻會使和比爾‧柯林頓有關的每個人帶來羞恥和屈辱。而秘密即將遭揭發...

5. 一項消息來源堅稱，在7月14日星期二, 早上8點, 「他們準備好去進行」總統的提名。「那毫無道理」密報者哀傷的說(informant lamented), 看著他熟睡的孩子，比爾柯林頓一定想起了貝茜預言會發生的事，只要他膽敢跑下(run)競選的話...在先前競爭惡劣的州長選舉時，他和希拉蕊事實上就讓小雀兒喜準備好面對最殘酷的選民抨擊了。幾乎像是喪事型態(funeral type)，站在一幀當月稍早拍攝穿深色西裝的州長照片前，沉思著他膝上(lap)的一則文句(text): 阿肯色州報1987年7月15日的頭版頭條「雀兒喜說這個字：不」，這次報紙的預測正確，在他的許多朋友和支持者面前，州長的確以聲音表達(voice)這個魔術性，悲劇性的字：不。

在淚水和哀歎聲中(tears and lamentations), 州長擁抱了哭泣的州長夫人後，走下了指揮台(podium)。

DB, SSN057-86-4042,
June 21, 2011, Tuesday,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

Reply to Multiply Service Jack, draft20110621

servicejack wrote on Jun 20
Hi,

Unfortunately, this is not something that we can do. We can disclose private information such as IP addresses to our members.

I apologize for the inconvenience.

Thanks.
- Jack
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Multiply Customer Service Jack:

Although I am not agent of local military or police member, I was informed around (2001)2000, ten years ago, that my Microsoft Hotmail account, chaokai_chang@hotmail.com, was hacked by National Security Bureau agent(Taiwan) and later USA CIA high class officer(Lieutenant Colonel rank by payroll classifying) Ms Chang Lee-chuan, under the assistance of then Democratic Progressive Party governmental outpost overseas.

This hotmail account was a Microsoft product, bounded with a paying product of Microsoft operation system 32, 97, XP and office software XP, to starting account. I was notified just for this reason. The reference official was the former Taipei County Admin. Chief Dr Yu Ching, at the moment serving Taipei City Legislator post. And he only notifying me with an email along message that this Microsoft webmail account cannot be used, in spite of that he should know that was his DPP outpost agent doing identity theft of this hotmail account.

That's what I know since the account was plotted to get rid of that identity in year 2000, only I was hit by a military administrative car at Taipei City just after 2001 Thanksgiving day on November 29th. I am quite not willing to take care of such a case because that was publicly threatening, you know.

Anyway, for your information. If possible, please offer your kindly assistance. I would be very appreciated.

David CK Chang, SSN057-86-4042, F121485303,
June 21, 2011,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

To Microsoft Customer Service:電郵遭駭客冒用位址

親愛的微軟網頁電郵客服：在2011.6.15我所使用的微軟hotmail(Livemail)網頁電子郵件服務chaokai_chang@hotmail.com，收到了標頭為簡體字中文「搜牛網」的垃圾信件，但是電郵發送地址為我本身的hotmail電子郵件地址：chaokai_chang@hotmail.com,遭駭客冒用的情況實屬異常，我把該郵件保留在我的電郵信箱的inbox，可不可以請微軟公司的客服協助處理或查明遭駭的原因，謝謝。

David CK Chang, SSN057-86-4042, June 17, 2011, National Central Library, Taipei City

To Multiply Customer Service

Dear Multiply customer service:

My Multiply website "chaokai's Site", the record on Viewing History for Entire Site, has entries of 13 days ago, 43 days ago, by chaokai_chang@hotmail.com; and an entry of 35 days ago, by chaokai_chang@yahoo.com.tw. These two email accounts were both mine.

Could you please help me verify if all the connecting internet IP were all connected from the local governmental IP of National Central Library of Taipei City. I wished to make sure whether or not there were saftey issues other than my editing personal document while log-in and using MSN Hotmail and Yahoo! web-mail service to be recorded such Multiply log of viewing entries. Thanks for your help.

Best Regards,

David C.K. Chang,
SSN057-86-4042,
June 16, 2011,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

Sofitel(Sophia Hotel), Diary06132011

June 13, 2011, Monday, Sunny

Sophia

In May the prospective French President candidate, the I.M.F. chairman Mr. Dominique Strauss-Kahn had a scandal at Sofitel(Sofia Hotel) at Manhattan. I especially remembered this hotel because I had bought an emerald bangle for my mother as a present at the Sophia boutique in Shin-Kwang Sun-Yue Department Store at Taipei City, before I went to New York City for business graduate school studies in 1996 summer.

(When I was at New York City,) my cousin Ms. Ivy Chang called me to her United Airlines Manhattan lodge, which was called "Sofitel, Sophia Hotel". That's all. The date was before August 2, 1996, which was the CUNY Baruch college school opening day, (and before my grandmother Mrs. Wang-me Chang died on August 9 for medical gross negligence at Taipei) that the USA First Lady Mrs. Hillary Clinton addressed a speech to the students, except that all the classmates including Ms. Shiaw Hong from China were absent. The White House and the First Lady seemed to concern about the China students' absence linking to USA diplomatic issue with China. Mr. Paris Mayor Nicolas Sarkozy with his son (of Baruch College freshman)were there, too.

D.B. SSN057-86-4042,
Typed by DB in National Central Library, on June 14, 2011

司法信箱：美國官員(希拉蕊)告知缺乏良知的陳菊不適合輔導人權案

收信日期： 100/06/14 @ 16:38
收信單位： 司法院
姓　　名： 張朝凱
電子信箱： chaokai_chang@hotmail.com
電　　話： 89529809
意見標題： 美國官員(希拉蕊)告知缺乏良知的陳菊不適合輔導人權案
意見內容： 敬愛的司法院長賴浩敏先生：

關於1994年8月14日，美國國會人員由美國第一夫人希拉蕊‧柯林頓夫人率團來訪，被前立法委員水扁先生與演習代指揮官在觀禮台上，詢問是否再度選上並誤稱為州長夫人一事，並於同時間小布希州長遭高立吉上尉拘留於憲兵司令部三日，還有依娃‧愛弗麗中士(Sgt. Eva Ivory)遭指令護主自殺或意外贅樓當日死亡，在先前1994年4月至8月間討論處理之聯合國小朋友大衛(David)之受虐兒案問題；希拉蕊女士當時對她在1979年至1984年間將板橋地區小朋友大衛(David,中文姓名為張朝凱)的受虐兒案存檔於聯合國，並經由馬英九先生轉交於政治大學學生陳菊，陳菊在未畢業即由後來的德州州長與美國總統喬治‧小布希先生任職的美商公司，延攬為工讀生出納員，並在大學畢業後依公司要求至國防部簽立合約，領取外籍顧問等級津貼；在1993年小朋友大衛，在新竹市交通大學畢業並於板橋地區憲兵隊一帶履行國民義務兵役，應是希拉蕊‧柯林頓女士以訊息進行告知，因發現陳菊因美商讀書機器招攬業務長期騷擾小朋友大衛的家庭，在1994年8月來訪時，告知時任德州州長的小布希先生以前的公司同事陳菊，因為「缺乏良知」的理由，不適合擔任大衛的人權案輔導員。陳菊在1994年8月當時以吳淑珍前立委助理的身份，當場表達不服裁定與抗議，推測陳菊必須要，也應該會有文件形式進行說明；這件事的原因是因為在1988年小朋友大衛就讀台北市立建國高中二年級時，蔣宋美齡在聯合國大會的一個session，對她的再興中學學生張美玲遭受騷擾輟學割盲腸與至精神科門診等侵權一事，進行聯合國聽證作證，當時從美國方面查到陳菊在台灣當地操縱聽證案的受害者的哥哥，對聯合國的意見抽樣調查進行反對意見，是以美商機器公司的商業利益為由，妨害再興中學輟學當事人張美玲個人與親屬的利益，蔣宋美齡女士在聽證會上當場指示紐約市的隨從透過美國官方管道，在聯合國開會期8個小時之內，查到是台灣的陳菊所進行的，據悉陳菊也是騷擾再興中學一年級高中生張美玲輟學的直接關係人；陳菊當時因匿名操縱，立即透過日本管道對聯合國發送意見抽樣調查的高中生大衛的名字(張朝凱)，遞送聯合國最後並存檔於美國某參議員辦公室，以trouble-maker做為檔案標頭，嚴重妨害受虐兒案當事人輔導人身份在良知上的錯誤。陳菊後來對此聽證案是答辯不知道大衛小朋友(張朝凱)，是她擔任美商公司出納時騷擾輟學的再興中學新生張美玲的哥哥，因為她一定會為朋友作戰或是為美商公司繳費的顧客利益進行捍衛的，是因為誤會與遭人設局，才會對希拉蕊女士與台北市議會同期競選阿肯色州長示範民主的美國承諾違背，當時承諾的大衛小朋友當事人，做為民主示範區的讀書機器公司非繳費會員的唯一民眾的輔助承諾，而以機器向他的家庭成員侵權，違反當事人利益的；但是陳菊因為美國未具名的參議員的trouble-maker存檔資料查證，與聯合國聽證案的查證，以國防部簽約薪津軍人身份遭受嚴詞批評，因為高雄女中與政治大學畢業，與長期領取新台幣四萬元約當時10倍國營企業大學畢業生月薪的外籍津貼的背景，再加上可以匿名進行騷擾，僅有蔣宋美齡女士等少數人才查的到她的身份，所擔任國會助理一職的直屬長官吳淑珍立委也僅隱約知情，因此決定對已經上交通大學的受虐兒案的大衛小朋友直接騷擾，計畫複製騷擾張美玲高中輟學那樣，讓大衛從交通大學輟學，一輩子無法對其美商公司的侵權翻案。

在1990年於前交通部長連戰的女兒連詠心小學六年級從日本觀光攜帶入境的(粉紅)與黑色兩台愛華(或新力)隨身聽，借用陳菊的美商公司新機器操作當事人購買賺取差價，遭斗六彰化地區天主教agency機構當地交誼的台灣民眾記錄到，陳菊以美商機器公司身份出面，警告鄉下民眾銷毀連詠心的機器操作買賣記錄，要不然會對民眾報復(因對鄉下民眾無可奈何，最後直接以對交通大學連續兩個學期的電子學56分與60分全數死當為了結，當時圈選張大衛為哈佛準入學生的南茜雷根夫人，其加州橘郡16歲的李莉‧金(Lily King)曾觀察到柯林頓先生操控騷擾，違反李莉小妹妹要把David帶到美國去唸書的承諾夢想，推測應該是柯林頓先生查到張榮國有共和黨幹員身份，因怕雙面諜之麻煩上身所以決定反而對大衛進行課業騷擾)，陳菊另外在暑假即將結束時，匿名對交通大學二年級即將開學的張朝凱進行騷擾性質恐嚇，要求大衛小朋友以大學生身份自行處理妹妹的民權案，也就是1987年再興中學一年級遭其騷擾輟學的張美玲案件，同時在1990年11月1日阿肯色民主黨的州長比爾‧柯林頓先生乘坐軍機於新竹地區入境停留三日與希拉蕊乘坐民航機返美，在新竹市私下與小朋友大衛會面，當時並不諱言是因衝著建國高中時期的問題來的，並禱告後餐敘約2個小時，最後以言詞說服自言自語說已經取得當事人原諒，當場我並沒有進行拒絕式的否認，也就是律師式的取得同意的首肯，在2個小時的交談期，柯林頓先生曾進行訊息程式協同套話與測謊輔助一樣的空優掩護，想要瞭解初次在新竹清華大學正門口選修下課主動與其搭訕的學生，是否有黨工或職業學生身份；在與柯林頓午餐後，從德州共和黨通報訊息範圍(依娃中士生前訊息曾提及德州州長小布希先生與其搭乘直升機一類交通工具，從交通大學的建築物入境，因依娃中士已在1994年死亡，按刑事訴訟法證據章節，提交為單一證據以供參考)的達拉斯大學或德州農工大學，因博士班輟學遲到並空降在新竹市交通大學的張榮國副教授於11月中旬才至班上上課，以輟學生的碩士身份擔任副教授似乎有些奇特與特權；在台北的陳菊以國防部津貼員身份，笑稱張朝凱(大衛)智商較低很笨，但是不能直接回答他是否有國民黨黨工或職業學生身份，訊息中告知那既然上學期電子學可以直接死當，你連下學期的一起死當，那就會發現他什麼回報管道都沒有，當然就可以確定沒有黨工與職業學生身份了！在對話同時，線上操作確認到有海山國中楊麗鳳與其離異先生(聽說有接觸李登輝公子李憲文銷售業務)與長兄海山國中教務長的頂尖操作團隊，在二週內其獨子在東海大學因騷擾輟學困擾自殺身亡，其父親應該是有跟到國家圖書館並長期查訪，楊麗鳳班導聽說有罹患癌症。陳菊當時以國防津貼員身份，與蔣經國遺留給吳淑珍(曾詢問蔣經國先生是否知道她在機房是簽約的受雇身份)的整間操作員室，她機房操作說的話跟命令是一樣的，也就是國防部所謂的指令，在國防部有提撥經費的cover下，與發送命令具自由意志的執行下，整個行為就是回台的agent行為，然後將交通大學二年級生剛與柯林頓先生午餐的學生，全勤上課確認前建國中學身份後，將上下兩門電子學死當，被嘉義籍的中情局台灣區幹員組長獲悉後對剛落選的吳淑珍前立委直接詢問，被蔣方良與馬英九先生確認後直接在新竹槍斃，繳回蔣經國授予他的私人心腹印信，因在遭槍斃生前以幹員組長身份於美國簽立中情局幹員約，負責徵員業務的德州州長小布希先生在1994年當著依娃中士於其生前告知，大衛是他的輔導小朋友，要大衛將來自行處理(用語是報復這個詞彙)，因大學二年級上下兩學期死當的電子學案件，造成嘉義長輩於新竹(憲兵隊)遭槍決的事件。因前美國第43屆總統與前德州州長於1994年通知緣由，撰文提交，以供參考。

敬祝 時祺

新北市板橋區民眾 張朝凱
F121485303,SSN057864042,
June 14, 2011,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

Details of the waiver 1981 RAPC(Risk Agreement of Possessed Child)

Date: 100/01/28 @ 11:58 To: Judicial Yuan
Name: David CK Chang
E-mail: chaokai_chang@hotmail.com
Telephone: 89529809
TITLE: Details of the waiver 1981 RAPC(Risk Agreement of Possessed Child).
Content:
Dear Chief Justice Mr Hao-Ming Rai:

The following legal complaint is describing the details of the waiver 1981 RAPC(Risk Agreement of Possessed Child) document mentioned by two complaint documents sent to Judicial Yuan earlier this month(2011 January). The waiver RAPC was about the rights give-in on a 10-year-old manipulated possessed child Mr David Chang, a forty-year-old citizen of now the New Taipei City Panchiao District jurisdiction. The two Judicial legal complaints were,100/01/23 @ 16:12, "The Original Document of Risk Agreement of the Possessed Child Which Mrs Wu Shru-chen Claimed Dr Ma Ying-jeou had in 1996 Civil Rights Case." 100/01/25 @ 13:30, "The supporting evidence of the Waiver of legal liability, RAPC(Risk Agreement of Possessed Child), discussed by the Human Rights Council in 1996 New York City." This waiver RAPC mentioned in these two complaint documents was signed by my sister Mei-ling Chang when she was nine years old on a Lego toy company selling exhibition at Taipei City with my mother Mrs Wu Ying-shing when she was thirty-six years old in 1981. The timing was 1981, after the rapprochement breached between the ROC(Taiwan) and the USA, and the anniversary of Mr Ma Ying-jeou went to Boston for his Harvard Law School study of the doctorate degree. In Taipei City of some toy brick educational exhibition occasion(Lego), the nine-year-old child Ms Mei-ling Chang guided by the toy product promoting salesperson to sign an agreement of the content, "Agreement to give up legal compensation for any risk happened in the process of the manipulated possessed child (on scene)." The educational exhibition salesperson emphasized that any child who plays through the tutoring process would enhance IQ significantly. My nine-year-old sister was frequently praised for smart, quickly had my name "Chao-kai Chang" instead of hers signed on the paper and jumped onto the toy brick pile(Lego) on scene playing for about ten minutes before she was pushed down the toy brick pile by senior twelve-year-old male children who came in the exhibition. My mother was standing around the toy brick pile(Lego) but seemed to casually read books displayed on another booth. There were foreigners looked like infant educational workers or teachers, came near my mother and the salesperson who was collecting the signed agreements(waiver RAPC), blaming and notifying my mother that how could she(let my sister) sign that kind of legal rights give-in on document, because that was equal to slavery contract. Some young female of exhibition workers seemed to be from the Women Association in Taipei City, remarked in an arid tone that although many parents on scene signed that slavery contract with Lego toy company, there still were a lot more Taipei citizens did not sign that waiver RAPC. No wonder they were country folks coming from suburban area Taipei County without savvy of any law concept. Those 'country folks' who signed the waiver RAPC(Risk Agreement of Possessed Child) in 1981 at a Lego exhibition were very few, perhaps six of numbers count, including the agreement signed by Mr Lien Sheng-wen(Lien, Sean) of that pushy twelve-year-old group coming in the exhibition during my sister playing Lego toy. Mr Sean Lien(Sheng-wen Lien, the son of former Vice President Lien Chan) signed a subsidy attached contract when he was an elementary school teenager with pay around NTD$5000 monthly. It was later confirmed by an investigating law court in Taiwan(1994 and 1996, along with USA Sergeant Eva Ivory death case investigating and the filed lawsuit of relatives of Taiwan death recruits, as notified at Panchiao, Taipei County) that contract was a commercial sponsored one of merit-based, which was leading Mr Sean Lien in 1996 to have a chance to be enrolled to the subsidy offering commercial sponsor related Ivy League educational institute in New York City, the Columbia University. The 1981 Lego company and contract collecting party on that waiver RAPC did not have any mention of the effective duration nor did they have any mention of effective area. That was a slavery agreement by law except only Mr Sean Lien had a subsidy of NTD$5000 monthly for certain years. However, there were many other parents in the exhibition refused to sign that agreement. During the Lego educational exhibition in 1981, I was only 10 years old and at home myself, reading the children newspaper Mandarin Daily News, newly subscribed in my name, Chao-kai Chang, delivered just for the first week. In August 1996, this waiver RAPC(copy of that original document) was used by Taipei authority and the American Reading Machine Membership Company(ARM-MC, Taiwan area), submitted through a Japanese of the United Nations worker as the purpose of paper-form evidence for a plea of not guilty to the USA Federal Court in New York City on the Sergeant Eva Ivory Taipei death case, with the United Nations Human Rights Council officials as the jury. My role was blurred 1996 in New York City with my international student status with the F1-Visa issued by City University of New York Baruch Business School of its I-20 form. I never had any substantial material rewards paid from that Lego exhibition waiver contract except that my sister who signed it at the age of nine years old played the Lego toy bricks for only 10 minutes on scene. The Lego educational toy company was merged by an American financial group after that Taipei city sale promotion exhibition with those controversial RAPC waiver contracts collected by the ARM-MC and government officials related parties.

This following paragraph provides details related to the legal environment of Taipei in 1983 when my nine-year-old sister Ms Mei-ling Chang, instead of me, signed my RAPC(Risk Agreement of Possessed Child) in Lego toy exhibition. Last year on September 23, 2010 on Yahoo! Kimo personal website, I posted an article: "The White Fang of Mr Jack London and the United Nations child abuse case". There was a law case of Taipei District Court mentioned in my Yahoo! Kimo posted article to reveal such a legal environment of Taipei. That lawsuit was happened two years later after my RAPC, a.k.a. slavery status agreement, had been signed by my nine-year-old sister, when I was twelve years old. That was about a series of classic literature adapted for children with hardcover which my mother Mrs Wu Yu-shing check out from the Taipei County Hope Elementary School Library for me to read. That hardcover series of books was edited and translated or adapted for children by an alumna who was just graduated from Harvard University majored in literature. She was from the Chang-Hua County of Taiwan. This series of classic literature adapted by that Harvard alumna for children seemed to have some copyright disputes with the England original author. However, the law case was that my cousin Mr Chang Jia-ling who was Taipei County Short-long Elementary School pupil in the Chung-her city area, with his mother Mrs Lin(Liu) Ming-hui, and one relative of then Taipei County Administrative Chief Mr Lin Fong-cheng, came to Taipei District Court to sue that "Harvard Man(Woman)" of the Chang-hua County citizen conducted abuse by verbal threats to the young children when the book company did the auxiliary reading. Because the country folks had no savvy of law concepts, they finally lost the lawsuit but shared a reconciled compensation for humanity of amount NTD$100,000. That was a big deal of money at that moment. My father Mr Chang Cheng-chi who was graduated from Tatung College in Taipei City and employed by the National Enterprise Taiwan Power Company, he had a monthly salary only NTD$8,000, just jumped from a promotion with NTD$3,000 several months before. My aunt Mrs Lin(Liu) Ming-hui shared the total reconciled compensation NTD$100,000 offered by the Harvard alumni defendant with NTD$18,000. But the worst thing was that my aunt Mrs Lin(Liu) Ming-hui previously heard that some interests groups would harass those who filed a lawsuit. When my aunt with one relative of former Taipei County administrative chief Mr Lin Fong-cheng walked out of the Taipei District Court, one member of the attorney who defended the Harvardman's case warned my aunt Mrs Lin(Liu) Ming-hui, saying that they were not suing a "Chang-hua County citizen" but were suing a "Harvard Man(Woman)." My aunt Mrs Lin(Liu) Ming-hui was afraid of revenge upon her young son Mr Chang Jia-ling, instead of writing down her son's name she had my name "Mr Chao-kai Chang", the name of eleven-year-old Hope Elementary School pupil, on the Taipei District Court law document as the only plaintiff who sued that Harvardman. The case finally settled with a reconciliation of NTD$100,000, but officially my aunt lost the lawsuit with my name. Up to this moment in 2011 when I am forty years old, I have never been officially informed by the Taipei District Court about this case which had my name on the law court document. Two years after that losing lawsuit settled with reconciliation compensation, when I was fourteen years old, my teeth were almost cut and destroyed by energy device to be filled in the Duke University twin brothers dental clinic around my home on Chunghsio Road of Panchiao City. This was recorded in the United Nations file as a child abuse case, filed by Ms Hillary Rodham of Yale University alumna in 1979 and continued through 1984, transferring to Ms Chen Chu of the National Cheng-chi University(NCCU) student. When I came to National Central Library in 2006, it was informed to me that this child abuse case with the infant teeth destroyed by energy device, was done by the young son of Mr Lin Fong-cheng who was in the United States of America in 1979 for higher education study. He signed a military contract in the USA, and was forced to commit suicide before the ethnics white young trooper of Arkansas ordered by his governor to commit suicide and died in Taiwan. Therefore such a law environment was something to bestow a curse upon the UN case of abused child, David Chang, that is me, until I was forty years old, affected by sort of governmental secret documents and the death chronically involved. That is why in spite I was graduated from university in 1993 I was still without a marriage, a job or a kid, no more than a slavery of lowest social status, pauper.

In the above paragraph mentioned my aunt Liu(Lin) and relative of the Taipei County Administration Chief Mr Lin Fong-Cheng, of de facto identity theft using my name "ChaoKai Chang" at Taipei District Court to sue a Harvardman of children books author, and that case settled with a reconciled humanity compensation NTD$100,000 but should be announced a defending success. In this Taipei District Court appealing case the sole plaintiff of my name "ChaoKai Chang" which appeared on the law court document, was a defeated case. But as the defending lawyers at session break on court made a warning to my aunt and relative of Mr Lin Fong-cheng, there were reasons to believe that the UN Case of abused child "Mr. ChaoKai Chang, a.k.a. Mr David Chang" was suffering a post law court revenge, with his teeth dented by energy device to cut and filled by the Ivy League Duke University dentist near his house. In the complaint letter sent to Judicial Yuan on October 21, 2010, titled "Ms. Chen Chu of the Democratic Progressive Party(DPP) had a false motive to proceed this civil rights case", the contents mentioned about "...late President Mr Chiang Ching-Kuo, his English Secretary Mr. Ma Ying-Jeou ever through some channels to find my mother Mrs Wu Yu-Shing for filing a case against the American Reading Machine (ARM) company. Mr. Ma Ying-Jeou said that he had persuaded two grammar school teenagers in Taipei City to join the lawsuit against that American ARM company. Mr Ma Ying-Jeou said that he wanted my mother Mrs Wu Yu-Shing and me to join the lawsuit as the third partner represented in Taipei County. Mr. Ma Ying-Jeou said that he had confidence to win the lawsuit. As he mentioned the lawyer fees to commission him for filing the lawsuit, Mr. Ma Ying-Jeou told my parents that was around NTD$100,000 or NTD$200,000." In those years messages contents notifying the plaintiff-would-be side, the teenager Mr David Chang, me, were through my mother Mrs Wu Yu-Shing from Hope Elementary School areas and also through my father Mr Chang Cheng-Chi from the National Enterprise of Taiwan Power Company. It was said that there were three lawyers including a National Taiwan University(NTU) Law School graduated lawyer came to my father's office at the Taiwan Power Company at Taipei City, telling him that the chance to win the lawsuit was very low and Mr Ma Ying-Jeou even participated in the reading machine membership fees collecting and without Taiwan lawyer license. It was because the American Reading Machine(ARM) company had paid an amount of money of one million New Taiwan dollars through the company cashier Ms. Chen Chu, hired three lawyers to go to Taiwan Power Company and suggested my father to give up the lawsuit, therefore we did not pay that amount of commission money to Mr Ma Ying-Jeou to file the lawsuit. It was not because we could not afford the lawyer commission or unwilling to pay that commission. As I was communicated with the Harvard Business School Alumni in those years, probably Mr George Bush Jr. of the ARM company PR, saying that if the pupil of Mr President Chiang Ching-Kuo, i.e. Mr David Chang, had commissioned lawyer to sue the ARM company, he as the company PR would let Mr David win this case. Mr PR George Bush Jr. argued that it would be as well as an American interests to make pupil Mr David win such an amount of money and planning a schedule in his future to study in the USA, say, Harvard University and to be his junior. But lawsuit in court was not that easy as we were thinking when under persuading or lobbying outside the court. In those years the young Bush Jr. of Harvard alumni could be probably a scapegoat for his senior to undertake responsibility for the ARM company. The timing was coincident with moment of rapprochement breach between Taiwan and the USA. The late President Mr Chiang Ching-kuo observing that a lot of Taipei area school teenagers and their parents coming to the law court to sue the ARM company misdeeds, Mr Chiang only told the audience with such messages, "We cannot afford to make the Americans angry," and "...but to sue the American company was your own business." After these years, in 2011, today, simply eyeing such case of not paying lawyer fees to sue in the court, I had an article posted on personal website blog on December 8, 2010, "Ridiculous United Nations Human Rights Cases of Taipei," translated to English on December 10, 2010. In the article I mentioned about the 43rd USA President Mr George W. Bush and the 42nd USA First Lady Mrs Hillary Clinton. In those days if this lawsuit case against the ARM company PR Mr George Bush Jr. which required lawyer fees of NTD$100,000 to NTD$200,000 paid to Mr Ma Ying-Jeou, only defeated or something, there would be a legal document as such remained in the law court of Taipei jurisdiction. For these several months after this article posted on my personal website, to certain degree be censored and controlled by this library software WEBSENSE, the privy obviously cannot be denied to becomes the governmental controlled target. That is to say, as to the personal interests, for sure there would be damage and loss influenced by the case. For your reference, sir.

Best Regards,

David CK Chang,
Citizen of New Taipei City Panchiao District,
F121485303,SSN057864042,
January 28, 2011,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

Translated by DB, June 9, 2011, National Central Library, Taipei City

司法信箱：民權案賠償之淡江大學電機所就讀期間騷擾當事人部份

收信日期： 100/06/07 @ 13:00
收信單位： 司法院
姓　　名： 張朝凱
電子信箱： chaokai_chang@hotmail.com
電　　話： 89529809
意見標題： 民權案賠償之淡江大學電機所就讀期間騷擾當事人部份
意見內容： 敬愛的司法院長賴浩敏先生：

關於2006年存板橋文化路郵局證信函第10011號寄往台北地方法院劉亭柏法官附件所計算賠償金試算A4文件，提到的民權案賠償之淡江大學電機所就讀期間騷擾當事人部份：

在100/05/04 @ 11:08寄往司法信箱文件「國安局騷擾民眾生活與學業--淡江大學與國民黨部分」中，在文件的第2段中提到「國安局簽立美國中情局校官級合約的張麗娟」與「我姊夫戴耀聰即台北縣警局副局長親自前往河堤第一現場處理，關於後埔國小教師張麗娟的車禍殺人案」；文件中第5段中提到「2004年淡江大學余繁教授」等等情事。我在2001年9月9日於颱風天至台北縣淡水鎮的淡江大學教授辦公室，找曾任工學院長的余繁教授擔任指導教授，是在錄取通知後前往的，但是我是備取第四錄取。名條上有一名曾姓學生排在我之前，我並不知道其身份，若轉換身份後立即死亡的蘇明信與備取名單有牽涉，我雖然受到影響，但是卻毫不知情的。張麗娟為後埔國小教師，在2000年4月左右自行與同事林雅娟對徐旭東商店國安局內觀察之竊盜嫌疑案蒐證，在2000年3月29日台北地方法院違反刑事訴訟法第63條的(無行為能力不起訴)裁判與法庭文件作成後(台北地院文件分別由量販商店徐旭東先生的法律代表收件，與2000年8月底週休二日由檢查官楊淑珍與張麗娟攜往美國紐約市聯邦法庭，並未通知當事人，甚至還傳出以名字抄寫錯誤為理由進行詐欺性質混亂)，違反法律程序，進行非法保安處份(憲法第八條違反)，張、林兩人一直透過後埔國小教師網路干擾當事人，例如在後埔國小教師帶頭對當事人連續嘲笑式相親，當事人與後埔國小網路範圍下多人多次失敗相親，個人連續支付吃飯聯誼費用單次約新台幣1000元，總計達一、二萬新台幣之譜，被板橋市後埔國小擔任教師的當事人母親同事當做笑柄。

國安局雇員張麗娟她曾在2000年6月與林雅娟，在台北市中華路二段靠近西門町的本田私人汽車上，曾詢問我是否認識線上通訊操作的蘇先生，張麗娟突然告知我說「明信片...阿信，他說是你同學。」我當時並聽不懂她說什麼，在當時服用理斯必妥感官遲滯藥物作用下，隱約有線上操作者的退怯回應，我當時回答我不認識。據了解在2000年8月蘇明信車禍死亡之前告知張麗娟因其女友懷孕長官要求立即與之結婚，因為我在2000年6月的回答得到啟發，可能對張麗娟否認他的建中與台大還有蘇明信的姓名身份，與蘇明信在陽明山國安局類似妓院場合有收費性交行為的張麗娟，因無法確認蘇明信身份，與民進黨徵員組長吳淑珍的公開告知對國民黨的員額縮編壓力下，於國安局陳水扁精神講話當天下午，進行車輛躁進衝撞對方致死的行為。我在2000年4月到台北市漢口街補習國內電機資訊研究所考試，當時也有告知前來蒐證的張麗娟與林雅娟(但是實際情況是我並未被告知兩人為國安局與台北地方法院蒐證者，為刑法上背信詐欺行為)，在2001年8月底淡江大學電機所錄取通知後，在初期張麗娟還有操控誘導我與其租賃處的「男友」以手機對話，很明顯的操控羅織有利的情況以利其所謂的「竊盜嫌疑案蒐證」與後來的蘇明信刑事殺害案煙滅證據脫罪，在2002年隔年的淡江大學電機在職專班新生，甚至還有後埔與埔墘國小教師的國安局人員，以小學教師不相關科系背景，跑到淡江大學電機在職研究所成為我的下一屆學弟，接續張麗娟與林雅娟的所謂「竊盜嫌疑犯」的管制蒐證行為，這樣在重度能量騷擾與國安局人員意圖與行為可見下，最後我並沒有拿到淡江大學電機研究所的碩士學位。

敬祝 時祺

新北市板橋區民眾 張朝凱,
F121485303,SSN057864042,
June 7, 2011,
National Central Lirary,
Taipei City

「我們不曾相遇過」--比爾‧柯林頓傳Ch 31

Bill Clinton: An American Journey, Great Expectation, Nigel Hamilton, 2003, Random House
Chapter 31, 我們不曾相遇過, Page 474, Page 475, Page 475, Page 476, Page 476

1. 比爾‧柯林頓最後被他的幕僚長叫去解釋[這件事]，一個女人[喚他]，而且當著一個證人面前。

2. 比爾‧柯林頓後來不但否認有私通性行為(the sexual liaisons)，還否認與當年[1979]法庭上的貝茜(Betsey)曾經相遇過。在柯林頓後來當總統時，他的律師替他辯護寶拉‧瓊斯案(the Paula Jones Case)，柯林頓的律師後來給貝茜‧萊特(Betsey Wright)看記者馬拉尼斯(Maraniss)的傳記文件(1995, First in His Class)，內容中提到貝茜對1987年7月柯林頓州長性醜聞(affairs)的個人調查資料，在全錄影印機複印的記者馬拉尼斯所寫的書中一頁，比爾，柯林頓在空白眉批處手寫著：「這從未發生過！我不知道為什麼她要捏造這樣的事！」

3. 貝茜沒有撒謊，以前也不曾是撒謊的騙子...一個最小心謹慎的記者，馬拉尼斯書中的比爾的祕密審判故事，是從有攝影機對著貝茜‧萊特和她的女伴姊妹(companion)進行審理的法庭得來的，幾近完全正確的...但是馬拉尼斯在引述萊特時犯了一個小錯誤。「...我是照我頭頭給我的名字去稱謂的(I named names out of my head),大概就是這樣子的勞什仔事...我也不曾把這樣的事寫下來。」貝茜笑著說。

4. 在問到自傳回憶錄是否要在總統離開白宮時的黃昏遲暮之年再將真相重見光明，貝茜‧萊特當時明顯藐視[這本書], Betsey Wright was contemptuous[of this book],「我對他或那本書都沒興趣！」貝茜嘲笑著說。「他有那種能力可以忘記事情，合理化事情，分隔片段事情，都會使它毫無用處。他寫的任何書都毫無用處，我對他寫的書沒興趣！」

5. 因為貝茜做了那事，那，那(... ...)，他[比爾‧柯林頓]不可以跑掉。For Betsey had done that thing, that, (... ...), that he[Bill Clinton] couldn't run.

6. Page 474 (appeared on 1996 August CUNY Baruch textbook): Encouraged to do so herself, Ann called the mansion, "and I was told Hillary was there. I was asked if I wanted to talk to her. I said, 'No! I need to talk to him!' I...

DB, SSN057-86-4042,
June 7, 2011, Tuesday,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

「黑暗之心」--比爾‧柯林頓傳Ch 30

Bill Clinton: An American Journey, Great Expectation, Nigel Hamilton, 2003, Random House
Chapter 30, 黑暗之心, Page 451, Page 452, Page 454, Page 456, Page 460, Page 463, Page 465, Page 466

1. 愛德華‧甘迺迪因為Chappaquiddick和其他可能被揭露的癖好而失去競選總統的機會。

2. 在1987年5月，邁阿密論壇報揭露蓋瑞‧哈特參議員公然的通姦(in-your-face adultery)，哈特出於傲慢或是慷慨，惠予邁阿密選民萊斯夫人(Donna Rice)到華府拜訪時「和下任美國總統上床」的機會。萊斯夫人和他睡了，但是也幸好有論壇報，使得哈特參議員沒有成為下任總統。

3. 在夜店唱歌刺激的外表下，珍妮佛‧花兒有著和希拉蕊那樣的共和黨性格，也同樣老式的玩這遊戲。那彷彿是比爾的癖好與充滿奇炫的世界帶她過度超越核心文化價值，和他相戀了十年，她答應與他共遊性的外太空...但是從內在裏，珍妮佛永遠無法對外星生物感到習慣覺得不舒服，倒反而習慣了婚外情。

4. 吉姆(麥道格)承諾白水案將會支付雀兒喜的教育費用。

5. 狡猾的威利(Slick Willie)負責總統競選的運作，那是依照當地一家餐館的名字取的，成長的軍隊般支持者、競選財務經費負責人、國王擁立者(kingmakers)、遊說團體工作者、律師、志願工作者...

6. 但是比爾‧柯林頓生存下來了！他成了美國總統！你比較想要這樣的成功，還是比較想要阿肯色州報與洛克斐勒(Winthrop Rockefeller)有些失敗的那樣？

7. 所以當你寫你的自傳時，你必須要說，我訪談了許多比爾‧柯林頓的評論家，而至於你，身為讀者，必須了解這些人來自於1950年代一個不同的歷史時期，他們將偽證(perjury)看的十分嚴重！

8. 「我做所有那些事的原因，都是為了他做的。」貝茜(Betsey)嘆了一口氣不情願的回答...那是一個無法否認的事實，不管格林伯格(Greenberg)說了「狡猾的威利」什麼壞話，他一定對比爾‧柯林頓的州長做背書保證，其實不是因為信任他，而是在當時沒有更好的人選了。

9. Page 467(appeared on 1996 August CUNY Baruch textbook): Hillary had acknowledge the problems that teenagers faced in modern society, society that was "bombarding kids with sexual messages...Hillary felt, to help teenagers say no to sex...If so, she had forgotten to include her own "sixteen-year-old": William Jefferson Clinton.

10. Page 468(appeared on 1996 August CUNY Baruch textbook): Poor Bill, however, had never been able to master birth control, let alone self-control, and it seemed too late now to do so--as he himself was painfully aware...

DB, SSN057-86-4042,
June 5, 2011, Sunday,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

What Harvard PR Mr George Bush Jr. told the Taipei pupil Mr David

draft20110603, Details of the waiver 1981 RAPC. Continue from draft20110513, Details of the waiver 1981 RAPC
Date: 100/01/28 @ 11:58 To: Judicial Yuan
TITLE: Details of the waiver 1981 RAPC(Risk Agreement of Possessed Child). Content:Dear Chief Justice Mr Hao-Ming Rai:

...In the above paragraph mentioned my aunt Liu(Lin) and relative of the Taipei County Administration Chief Mr Lin Fong-Cheng, of de facto identity theft using my name "ChaoKai Chang" at Taipei District Court to sue a Harvardman of children books author, and that case settled with a reconciled humanity compensation NTD$100,000 but should be announced a defending success. In this Taipei District Court appealing case the sole plaintiff of my name "ChaoKai Chang" which appeared on the law court document, was a defeated case. But as the defending lawyers at session break on court made a warning to my aunt and relative of Mr Lin Fong-chen, there were reasons to believe that the UN Case of abused child "Mr. ChaoKai Chang, a.k.a. Mr David Chang" was suffering a post law court revenge, with his teeth dented by energy device to cut and filled by Duke University dentist near his house.

In the complaint letter sent to Judicial Yuan on October 21, 2010, titled "Ms. Chen Chu of the Democratic Progressive Party(DPP) had a false motive to proceed this civil rights case", the contents mentioned about "...late President Mr Chiang Ching-Kuo, his English Secretary Mr. Ma Ying-Jeou ever through some channels to find my mother Mrs Wu Yu-Shing for filing a case against the American Reading Machine (ARM) company. Mr. Ma Ying-Jeou said that he had persuaded two grammar school teenagers in Taipei City to join the lawsuit against that American ARM company. Mr Ma Ying-Jeou said that he wanted Mrs Wu Yu-Shing and me to join the law suit for the third partner represented in Taipei County. Mr. Ma Ying-Jeou said that he had confidence to win the law suit. As he mentioned the lawyer fees to commission him for filing the lawsuit, Mr. Ma Ying-Jeou told my parents that was around NTD$100,000 or NTD$200,000." In those years messages contents notifying the plaintiff-would-be side, the teenager Mr David Chang, me, were through my mother Mrs Wu Yu-Shing from Hope Elementary School areas and also through my father Mr Chang Cheng-Chi from the National Enterprise of Taiwan Power Company. It was said that there were three lawyers including a National Taiwan University(NTU) Law School graduated lawyer came to my father's office at the Taiwan Power Company at Taipei City, telling him that the chance to win the lawsuit was very low and Mr Ma Ying-Jeou even participated in the reading machine membership fees collecting. It was because the American Reading Machine(ARM) company had paid an amount of money one million new Taiwan dollars through the company cashier Ms. Chen Chu, hired three lawyers to go to Taiwan Power Company and suggested my father to give up the lawsuit, therefore we did not pay that amount of commission money to Mr Ma Ying-Jeou to file the lawsuit. It was not because we could not afford the lawyer commission or unwilling to pay that commission.

As I was communicated with the Harvard Business School Alumni in those years, probably Mr George Bush Jr. of the ARM company PR, saying that if the pupil of Mr President Chiang Ching-Kuo, i.e. Mr David Chang, had commissioned lawyer to sue the ARM company, he as the company PR would let Mr David win this case. Mr PR George Bush Jr. argued that it would be as well as an American interests to make pupil Mr David win such an amount of money and planning a schedule in his future to study in the USA, say, Harvard University and to be his junior. But lawsuit in court was not that easy as we were thinking when under persuading or lobbying outside the court. In those years the young Bush Jr. of Harvard alumni could be probably a scapegoat for his senior to undertake responsibility for the ARM company. The timing was coincident with moment of rapprochement breach between Taiwan and the USA. The late President Mr Chiang Ching-kuo observing that a lot of Taipei area school teenagers and their parents coming to the law court to sue the ARM company misdeeds, Mr Chiang only told the audience with such messages, "We cannot afford to make the Americans angry," and "...but to sue the American company was your own business." After these years, in 2011, today, simply eyeing such case of not paying lawyer fees to sue in the court, I had an article posted on personal website blog on December 8, 2010, "Ridiculous United Nations Human Rights Cases of Taipei," translated to English on December 10, 2010. In the article I mentioned about the 43rd USA President Mr George W. Bush and the 42nd USA First Lady Mrs Hillary Clinton. In those days if this lawsuit case against the ARM company PR Mr George Bush Jr. which required lawyer fees of NTD$100,000 to NTD$200,000 paid to Mr Ma Ying-Jeou, only defeated or something, there would be a legal document as such remained in the law court of Taipei jurisdiction. For these several months after this article posted on my personal website, to certain degree be censored and controlled by this library software WEBSENSE, the privy cannot be denied to be the governmental controlled target. That is to say, as to the personal interests, for sure there would be damage and loss influenced by the case. For your reference, sir.

Best Regards, David CK Chang, Citizen of New Taipei City Panchiao District, F121485303,SSN057864042, January 28, 2011, National Central Library, Taipei City

Translated by DB, June 3, 2011, National Central Library, Taipei City

司法信箱：交通大學1991年討論的張榮國副教授的台美雙方任務指令

收信日期： 100/06/01 @ 12:36
收信單位： 司法院
姓　　名： 張朝凱
電子信箱： chaokai_chang@hotmail.com
電　　話： 89529809
意見標題： 交通大學1991年討論的張榮國副教授的台美雙方任務指令
意見內容： 敬愛的司法院長賴浩敏先生：

在100/03/24 @ 16:18寄往司法信箱文件「聯合國受虐兒成年後的侵權案--1996紐約市」，第二段中提到『連詠心是連勝文的妹妹小我八歲(1979年次)曾在我母親的班上一個學期，在1990年十二歲，時間也就是我與柯林頓先生的午餐約會之前，曾經借用陳菊的讀書機器附贈的小型搖控手機(gadget)，誘導我至台北某電器行購買她到日本旅遊時帶回的水貨愛華AIWA品牌的收錄音機，遭到斗六地區台灣觀察員的記錄，陳菊公司的人員馬上進行恐嚇式說明，要求不准記錄未果；之後發生的事是從德州農工因經濟因素返回台灣交大任教的張榮國副教授把我的上下兩學期兩門電子學56與60分當掉(巧合是連勝文與類成運一樣可能都是56年次，我是60年次)，另外還有我從清華大學哈佛校友的經濟學下課到清華大學的客家小館與柯林頓先生見面的事』

我在1990年7月夏天到我父親張正吉的台電公司北北區救國團合辦的暑期工讀，大概有新台幣一萬元的工讀薪資，在暑假結束前被連家12歲的連詠馨從日本拿回兩台收音機家電，寄放在中華路電器行以5000多元新台幣賺取差價約2000元新台幣，聽說連詠心另一台小型收音機，也是以同樣的方式賣給我認識的同學，如果是在2000年8月車禍死亡蘇明信購入的，那案情會稍微比較複雜，雖然時間已經20年之後，但是陳菊主機附帶的handheld機器記錄上，應該還有辦法查到1990年連詠馨對台北地區進行的交易資料的，我是1993年7月15日入憲兵學校服義務役，同年11月9日擔任中尉職缺的排長，隔年1994年7月佔缺板橋憲兵隊中校職缺的憲兵官，在法律上憲兵隊中尉排長與中校憲兵官按規定皆為法官職，受國家憲法第81條保障，不可任意交由幫派或資本主義私人利益恩怨進行報復者。

我在1990年7月夏天到我父親的台電公司北北區救國團暑期工讀時，在第一個禮拜我到附近士林區中正路的王克民與李剛的新康精神科診所，我當著醫療管制的診所區，以理想熱忱兼具的交通大學準二年級生身份告知王克民先生，類似的行為係屬民權侵權，是類似幫派組織的騷擾犯罪，在1996年12月從紐約輟學返台時，訊息中由蔣宋美齡夫人與線上的希拉蕊‧柯林頓第一夫人確認為她們所知悉而關心的議題。王克民先生曾告知張美玲與我的母親吳玉幸，處理這種民權案「會傾家蕩產」；據我了解，在1985年馬英九從美國哈佛博士學成返台，當時蔣經國的榮總或太醫團隊，對於馬英九先生在美國曾簽立中情局約，另外對精神醫療制度極感興趣，蔣經國的太醫團隊的回答是「美國人這種醫療制度，在最後終局都是欺騙手段罷了」，於是太醫團隊答應實驗模仿美國精神醫療制度成立精神醫療體系來進行驗證，在兩年之內1987年我妹妹於再興高中輟學，是第一批被這些醫學實驗人員管制在相關醫療診所，迄今已超過23年了。在1990年7月我告知王克民先生「民權案」與「法益侵權」的用語後，張榮國副教授在1990年開學9月與10月都是缺課，在11月下旬空降新竹市，沒有博士學位為輟學生，以副教授身份對於少數全勤上課的學生，確認我是建國中學被美國與台灣官方登記的四名白種女生自殺案的替罪羔羊，確認身份後以電子學56分與60分當掉整門課，也將我的「民權案」處理的氣燄直接壓下來。在1990年新竹市交通大學的課堂上有公開討論美國共和黨軍事單位所謂的任務內容，環境條件與任務討論相當於1996年8月美國白宮官方與紐約市政府官員，在紐約市立大學巴魯克商研所的教室討論我祖母張王密在台北榮總醫療因民進黨與國民黨陳菊等人觀察疏失死亡的軍事侵權是一樣的，詢問我對台北政府的觀感並對我回答台灣民選後是民主制度感到不滿與進行規範性教育等等。據了解，任務內容在台灣官方這方面，也就是蔣經國遺留給吳淑珍立委的整台發送指令的機器，也就是可視為台灣官方蔣經國的指令來源的機器，吳淑珍前立委咸信在使用該指令時，皆會以不知情作為辯駁，在蔣經國去世之前，年輕的吳淑珍女士應該是簽立短期國防部合約，在機房擔任類似助理的工作，時間也是在與陳水扁先生的新婚初期。但是在1990年7月之後，除了在1990年11月1日競選阿肯色州長失利的柯林頓先生，可能乘坐州級軍用運輸飛機抵台三日，並於清華大學搭訕之後與我至附近客家小館共進午餐(據查證攜帶有銅管之類器械)，在第三日由尾隨來台的婦女會希拉蕊柯林頓女士偕同搭乘民航機返美；柯林頓先生並在數週後單獨來台灣，告知在台灣的三日並無法律糾紛，若由疑問歡迎去與他詳談等等。但是與我在1991年2月與我見過一面，意欲幫助我的加州橘郡李莉‧金小妹妹(因1984年新婚時的二線小女星加州南茜雷根夫人在台北圈選的哈佛大學重點培養台灣小朋友張大衛)，在這段時間發現柯林頓先生操作機器騷擾我唸書，並由德州達拉斯大學或德州農工大學博士班輟學回台的張榮國副教授連續兩學期當掉；超過193公分柯林頓先生推測是在台北市基督教女青年會的公開場合，對著163公分的李莉‧金做出威嚇性的肢體語言伴隨著說服力的告知，意思是說迫使對方失去有利地位本來就是合乎社會規範的，這份對話內容有被記錄下來，在隔天之後這件事就不了了之了。據說柯林頓先生在1992年之後，曾協助台灣的精神科醫療體系與美國的精神醫療制度相交流並且升級與現代化，目前台灣應該至少在表面上已經是與美國是採相同的醫療規範了。

敬祝 時祺

新北市板橋區民眾 張朝凱
F121485303,SSN057864042,
June 1, 2011,
National Central Library,
Taipei City