Quid Pro Quo and Civil Law

Date： 099/12/16 @ 13:26
TO： Judicial Yuan
Name： David CK Chang
E-Mail： chaokai_chang@hotmail.com
Telephone： 89529809
Title： Quid Pro Quo and Civil Law (The enclosure of 2006 Postal Certificate letter sending to Taipei District Court Judge Liu Ting-Boer)
Content：
Dear Chief Justice Mr Hao-Ming Rai:

The Panchiao Citizen of Taipei County, Mr David Chang, from 2004 through 2010 stayed at the National Central Library (the former National Chung-Young Library) investigating the harassment cases suffered by many citizens or visiting guests. Last submission to the Judicial Yuan official concerns the USA Sergeant Ms Eva Ivory dropped death case on August 14, 1994 in Bei-Tou area of Taipei City. In addition to that Sgt. Eva's case, on August 15, 1994, a Canadian female white second lieutenant military officer also committed suicide in the toilet of the National Central Library during the same military exercise period, when the library was under military occupation to have some offensive practice to harass the citizens which came to the library but were not informed about that military exercise. This Canadian military officer's case hereby is submitted with the previous USA Sergeant Eva Ivory's case, sir. As far as I know, the official record of this National Central Library security guard police team in 1994 was having a direct report of this female Canadian military officer suicide case submitted to the visiting delegates of USA Congress members but was denied by the USA official.

As to the law analysis, the Republic of China Constitution Article 2 imposes a rule that citizen body of ROC proclaims the sovereignty of the Republic of China. Because the specific citizen constitutional rights of Republic of China was outlawed with the judicial power, it is violating Article 2 of the Constitution. But at that time the government authority invoked the Civil Code of ROC Article 149 to justify the infringement for national defense needs to guard the rights of his own or another, and at that time the government authority also invoked the Civil Code of ROC Article 150 to justify the infringement for avoiding imminent danger menacing the life, body, liberty, or property of himself or another. For this justification of governmental authority of specific citizen constitutional rights infringement, I argue that we could refer to the fact that the USA Presidents have never signed the Geneva Protocol about the war prisoners(International Herald Tribune, 2007) to have an example for us to decide the involving parties of the quid pro quo issue for civil law compensation, calculating the money amount which would be collected from such involving parties. The National Chiao Tung University graduated student Mr David Chang, myself, from 1993 through 2010, has been verifying such governmental legal environment and that the specific citizen constitutional rights is outlawed for 16 years to be against the Constitution law Article 2. Therefore, such an observing fact of governmental legal environment could be set as an assumption to deduce the follow-up logic reasoning to support a Panchiao Wen-Hua Road Branch Postal Office registered Certificate Letter, No.10011, which was sent by Mr David Chang, me, to the Taipei District Court Judge Liu Ting-Boer and which has already arrived at the Taipei District Court Judge Liu Ting-Boer in June 2006. The enclosure of a one page A4-size document of that postal certificate letter No.10011 sent to the Taipei District Court Judge Liu Ting-Boer, describing the quid pro quo issue of civil law compensation claims to calculate the award amount of NTD$20,000,000 as a base to multiply a factor which lies between 10 and 100 times compensating for financial loss, pain and suffering. If we follow the example of the USA Presidents to exempt the Geneva Protocol about the definition about prisoner of war, to calculate the civil law compensation of involving parties, that is, the prisoners of war include civilians who have non-combat support roles with the military offense, the parties for compensation money collecting may be including the assistant of congress legislator, the library civilian administrative staff, the university student council and representatives, the public university faculty member or the librarian, the non-military social order keeping police armed force(the National Police Agency and Taipei City Police Department), and so on. These parties were serving from 2004 to 2005 as the accomplice of the military offense of infringement happened in National Central Library to damage the specific citizens constitutional rights.

Another aspect of such a civil law compensation case was complicated. In August of 1996 the Nationalist Party(KMT party) Executive Yuan Chief, Premier Lien Chan's spouse Mrs Lien Fun-Yee was in New York City, together with Democratic Progressive Party(DPP) former legislator Mrs Wu Shru-chen of Taipei City Mayor Mr Chen Shui-bian' s wife, to testify to the FBI and federal officials for how Sgt. Eva Ivory was affected in Taipei City to drop dead by the two reading auxiliary machines which was sold by a public relationship manager Mr George W. Bush in 1970s to Mrs Lien Fun-Yee and Mrs Wu Shru-chen. The death USA Sgt Eva Ivory had a sister, the lieutenant military officer Ms Eva Ivory(Liet. Eva), together with Liet Eva's mother under the democracy system of United States of America, Lieutenant Ms Eva Ivory's mother was asking then Texas Governor George W. Bush and then White House First Lady Mrs Hillary R. Clinton to testify to the FBI and investigating military officials(or congress officials), for their activity connecting to Sgt. Eva Ivory's death case in August of 1994. Before August 2, 1996 the CUNY Baruch College school opening day, premier Lien's spouse Mrs Lien Fun-Yee told the FBI and investigating official that she could herself decided that the CUNY Baruch College business graduate school student Mr David Chang who was the former Panchiao Military Police Station second lieutenant officer of Taipei to be the one to testify for what Texas Governor Mr George W. Bush and the White House First Lady Mrs Hillary R. Clinton did at Taipei City in August of 1994 when they were visiting Taipei for a military exercise and weapon purchase show. I was that military police second lieutenant officer David Chang, staying in New York City with an F1 student Visa of the City University Baruch Graduate Business School in August of 1996, I did not give any form of consent to that testifying to the FBI or USA military investigating official of Mr Texas Governor or Mrs White House First Lady in August 1994 of Taipei military exercise activity. The Liet. Eva Ivory and her mother were asking the military investigating official to replicate the so-called "military credit" issue of Sgt. Eva Ivory done at Taipei, plus the premier spouse Mrs Lien Fun-Yee decided by herself to make me, Mr David Chang, the one to testify for a special case of the USA apex officials Texas Governor Mr George W. Bush and USA President First Lady Mrs Hillary R. Clinton of their activities related to the Sgt. Eva Ivory's death case in 1994 on Taipei military exercise occasion. For such known circumstances, to be sure was that happened within tens of hours, my grandmother died from the intended medical errors at Veteran General Hospital of Taipei City. I am not quite sure that if Mrs Lien Fun-Yee of premier Lien's spouse had acquired the consents from my father Mr Chang Cheng-chi by his nodding head or any kind of that. About this we have to take a further step to make sure with my father Mr Chang Cheng-chi or former premier Lien's spouse Mrs Lien Fun-Yee, sir.

Best Regards,

Panchiao Citizen David CK Chang,
F121485303,SSN057864042,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

Translated by DB, Dec. 28, 2010, National Central Library, Taipei City

National Security Bureau American lawyer was suspected of bribery

Date： 099/11/23 @ 12:14
TO： Judicial Yuan
Name： David CK Chang
E-Mail： chaokai_chang@hotmail.com
Telephone： 89529809
Title： National Security Bureau American lawyer was suspected of bribery
Content:
Dear Chief Justice Mr Hao-Ming Rai and Judicial Yuan Justices:

In the summer of 2002, an American lawyer hired by National Security Bureau(NSB) at Taipei City was suspected of bribery by funnelling money with agent contract to the National Taiwan University(NTU) law school alumna young prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee of Taipei District Court after a car crash murder case in August 2000 was dismissed. One of his client Ms Chang Lee-chuan of the National Security Bureau(NSB) agent and informant, a teacher at local public Hope Elementary School was involved in a car crash murder case at Panchiao, Taipie County. The American lawyer hired by the NSB persuaded the young prosecutor Ms Chen of Taipei District Court to dismiss the car accident death case and urge the parties to make a reconciliation when the victim family was seriously in need of money. The agent contract to funnel money to the prosecutor was of the Central Intelligence Agency contract but the recruiting agency deceived the NTU alumna as a Federal Bureau Investigation contract, sir. For we all know that the FBI agents would only appear in the United States of America to fulfil their duty, not outside the USA. The top agent monthly salary at Taiwan area was currently said to be NTD$200,000, take the example of the one of the former Legislator Chen Shui-bian's contract as Taipei City mayor, plus the young prosecutor's monthly salary around NTD$60,000(may report to the recruit agency when signed the contract in 2001 of Taipei District Court the prosecutor's monthly salary up from NTD$80,000 to NTD$100,000 to reach the NTD$200,000 class subsidy of USA agency payroll in Taiwan area), would amount to a salary of NTD$260,000 a month. That significant amount of money funnelled without real duty when the contract described as an FBI contract, was surely a bribery paid by the client's American lawyer hired by NSB in return for the murder case being dismissed in August 2000. But that American lawyer of NSB was cunningly absent from the court when the young Taipei District Court prosecutor Ms Chen dismissed the car accident death case. Please refer to the following explanations:

Born in 1975 or 1976 at Taichung military community, the name of that young prosecutor of Taipei District Court of NTU alumna may be called Ms Chen Shru-lee, or Ms Chen Shru-hua, of height about 170cm to be imposing as a female prosecutor, supposed to be graduated from high school in Taichuan City area, then went to National Taiwan University Law School at Taipei City. Afer Ms Chen graduated she had been through Judicial Officer Training Class to be deployed to the Taipei District Court as prosecutor. The Taipei District Court prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee(hua) was easily to be confused with another young prosecutor Ms Yang Shru-chen(lee). During February and March of 2000, the president-elect Mr Chen Shui-bian's spouse Mrs Wu Shru-chen assigned the Fu Hsin Kang College(the former Political Warfare Academy) English or History department alumna, her name may be called Ms Yang Shru-chen or Ms Yang Shru-lee, the newly deployed NSB lieutenant officer, to be as the Taipei District Court prosecutor. The prosecutor Ms Yang Shru-chen(lee) was born in 1979 or 1980 at Chang-Hua County(Hsien), of height about 162cm, was previously assigned by Mrs Wu Shru-chen to the Taipei District Court to process a suspected petty-theft case informed by the NSB agents and informants Ms Chang Lee-chuan and Ms Lin Ya-chuan, meanwhile both holding the teacher's jobs of public Hope Elementary School at Taipei County, by making an anonymous email impeach to the Taipei District Court citizen complaint email account, and later the court complaint mail box. Because of the pressure from her supervisor Mrs Wu Shru-chen and the pressure from her Taipei Distric Court colleagues lasting months in year 2000 to make the petty-theft suspect case a dismiss ruling without physically notifying that petty-theft suspect or the defendant to be violating Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 63, the ruling of this petty-theft case by prosecutor Ms Yang Shru-chen of Taipei District Court was to be an invalid case.

Prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee(hua) was alumna of NTU Law School through the formal law school training process to hold the place at the judicial court. When Prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee(hua) heard this petty-theft case lasting for months, finally dismissed by the National Security Bureau lieutenant officer and the newly Taipei District Court Prosecutor Ms Yang Shru-chen(lee), together with summoned Taipei County Police Station deputy sheriff Mr Dai Yew-tsong, my brother-in-law, who was summoned by the president-elect spouse Mrs Wu Shru-chen of the NSB lieutenant officer Ms Yang Shru-chen(lee)'s supervisor, and the French Mall owner Mr Douglas Tong Hsu's employees who was the plaintiff at Taipei District Court, Prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee(hua) she expressed disagreement with the prosecutor Ms Yang Shru-chen(lee) of the same Taipei District Court who made that dismiss ruling. In August of 2000, one of the Panchiao Police Station police patrol of Taipei County Police Station who appeared to be undergoing some antipsychotic drug treatment, was called out to the scene of a car crash in Pu-Chen area of Panchiao City. He had a police disciplinary breach to accompany along with that accident driver, Ms Chang Lee-chuan, to the nearby Motel to wash and change her blood-splashed shirt which splashed when the driver Ms Chang Lee-chuan got off the car moving the dead body which she hit down by the car. That Panchiao Police Station police patrol had Ms Chang Lee-chuan's national identity card carbon-copied with photocopier at nearby Convenience Store around the murder criminal first scene in Pu-Chen area of Panchiao City, during which period Ms Chang Lee-chuan stayed in the Motel bathroom, of which key information the death car accident offending driver Ms Chang Lee-chuan apparently did not quite aware, sir. But when the police patrol was thinking about a missed call dialed from the Mitac International Corp during the working hours to the young Hope Elementary School teacher's cell phone lying on the motel bed, that forty-something police patrol (online observing, real-time connecting, and message received by many Mitac International Corp computer company engineers during the working hours; once my colleagues ever came to ask me about that observing contents but was denied by me) seemed quite obsessed with his single marital status and the psychotherapy drug use. This call was a double-blinded call to be a cue-up to the criminal scene with the police patrol in the motel, a cue-up call to the previously false dating love match of that car accident murder offender Ms Chang Lee-chuan from Mr David Chang of Mitac company's engineer, which the NSB agents and informants Ms Chang Lee-chuan and Ms Lin Ya-chuan previously in April 2000 with their supervisor Mrs Wu Shru-chen using their political power through the Hope Elementary School teacher network to trick the caller Mr David Chang's mother to believe that the two girls were going to be the love matches of his son. Mr David Chang's mother was also a teacher at Hope Elementary School at the moment, sir. Meanwhile, another police radio call interrupted the police patrol from a conversation with the car accident driver Ms Chang Lee-chuan, to call him back to the police station, but there was no other police patrol coming to that motel or the first criminal scene to follow up the murder case, sir. The American lawyer hired by National Security Bureau of that accident driver NSB agent Ms Chang Lee-chuan finally suggested his client to accuse this police patrol coming to the first criminal scene and that Motel being attracted sexually by that young female teacher Ms Chang to breach the police discipline. It was a year later that a notified message sent to me, the timing was right before a military administrative car hit me to the hospital for an operation on November 29, 2001, near the McDonald's fast food restaurant at Taipei City, that this forty-something police patrol died within a year after that car crash, by diagnosing a cancer disease in hospital, which was other than his previously antipsychotic drug treatment mental disorder, sir.

This car accident murder case was under prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee(hua) of the Taipei District Court, reported by the Taipei County police station on the day of the car accident. Earlier that day in August 2000, the NTU alumna Prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee(hua) had an appeal case rejected by the court judge and was teased by her Taipei District Court colleagues for not learning well in NTU law school about law, which she was infuriated and worried that reject would affect her future performance record at Taipei District Court. Just before sunset the police station transferred the car accident murder case to the Taipei District Court, because the police patrol at the first car accident scene and second motel scene was called away by unknown authority for another duty without other police members to take over, the car accident murder case was transferred to the Taipei District Court by my brother-in-law, the Taipei County Deputy Sheriff Mr Dai Yew-tsong, who went to the car accident scene for follow-up investigating, sir. The Taipei District Court Prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee(hua) knew this police officer Mr Dai Yew-tsong in March of that Mr Dougalus Tong Hsu's French Mall petty-theft investigating, but I doubted that she did not aware of his Deputy Sheriff rank status. She dismissed the car accident murder case with the persuading of NSB's American lawyer, who appeared to be like the foreign lawyer hired by Mr Dougalus Tong Hsu coming around in those months in Taipei District Court. Prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee(hua) seemed to be arrogantly making that dismiss ruling to wish to shame the county deputy sheriff Mr Dai Yew-tsong and also wish to shame her superior Taipei District Court judges who had her appeal case rejected and teased at her, for the same ruling as the Prosecutor Ms Yang Shru-chen(lee) did to the French Mall petty-theft case. That was what I know, sir.

The telephone number of Mitac International Corp showed up on the cell phone of the NSB agent and the accident driver, Ms Chang Lee-chuan, who was at the second criminal scene of a nearby motel, which number could be used by Ms Chang Lee-chuan the NSB agent to file a falsified document describing as her member of prostitute soliciting, when she ever mentioned with another NSB agent Ms Lin Ya-chuan to say that she disagreed with the provocative words which the USA Sgt. Eva Ivory said to the NSB agents before Sgt. Eva Ivory's suicide in 1994. Sgt. Eva Ivory ever had a prostitute soliciting cell phone number of the California girl Ms Lily King posted on the classified advertisement at National Security Bureau. The NSB agent Ms Chang Lee-chuan of Hope Elementary School teacher had a prostitute conduct soliciting at NSB, provided with the real money return to make a sex transaction to the very car accident death victim, a young male teacher of Panchiao City citizen who had an origin from Chang-hua County. The NSB agent Ms Chang Lee-chuan would probably make such a falsified document to the Mitac International Corp telephone number filed in National Security Bureau only for the reason to divert the investigating of car accident murder case, also probably could be encouraged by the former Democratic Progressive Party(DPP) Legislator and Taipei City Mayor Mr Chen Shui-bian who previously in August 1994 falsified a case of Sgt. Eva Ivory upon the Panchiao Military Police Station second lieutenant military police officer Mr David Chang of Panchiao City, to serve the need of DPP member Ms Chen Chu handed in a name list to the Republican Representative for USA military revenge purpose, the visiting USA Congress members. The NSB agents and elementary school teachers Ms Chang Lee-chuan and Ms Lin Ya-chuan were said that during which period, they were not only observing the French Mall, but also observing the suburb motel, taping what second lieutenant Mr David Chang making love to his girlfriend, a university student Ms Wen Lu, just like at the NSB in 1994 they taped the USA Sgt. Eva Ivory making love to her "boyfriends" for mandated prostitute services, as porn videos. In another words, these National Security Bureau agents Ms Chang Lee-chuan and Ms Lin Ya-chuan were quite familiar with this military police second lieutenant officer of Panchiao Mr David Chang by watching the Panchiao Military Police Station military open house video tape, before August 14, 1994 USA Sgt. Eva Ivory's suicide, and therefore before they making that trick dating of love match in April 2000.

I was fired by Mr Lin Ming-chen of the Hua Nan Comercial Bank on May 1, 2002. From lateral information to know the HNCB just fired me for a pretext of that another newly hired bank employee Mr Wu Guan-dei, born in 1975, had signed a CIA alike military agent contract from then president Mr Chen Shui-bian, while I directly refused Mr Chen Shui-bian to sign and refused to join Mr Chen Shui-bian's DPP but instead joined the KMT party in 1994. The undercover military agent Mr Wu Guan-Dei signed Mr Chen Shui-bian's military contract no more than two years then transferred to the law enforcement agency, the Investigation Bureau of Ministry of Justice to sign another FBI agent alike contract. In 2002, Mr President Chen Shui-bian told Mr Lin Ming-chen of HNCB's CEO that he wished to keep that two-agency contracts signer and the two-agency salary payrolls listed agent Mr Wu Guan-dei, staying inside the former Taiwan Province official bank, the Hua Nan Commercial Bank, for this nation's interests for undercover agency affairs, sir.

That summer, the USA Federal Government officer Mr George W. Bush was the recruit director responsible for the international recruiting affairs. The recruit agent in 2001 provided a quota to Taipei authority for CIA agency recruiting. The targets were including the Taipei District Court dismissed car accident driver Ms Chang Lee-chuan, the French Mall petty-theft case and Military Reserve Officer Affairs counselor, then NSB chairman General Mr Ding Yu-chou, the Taipei District Court prosecutor Ms Yang Shru-chen, or Ms Yang Shru-lee(she went to New York City along with the dismissed car accident death case offender Ms Chang Lee-chuan and detained by NYPD or Federal investigation court for three days in the autumn of 2000, and had signed a low level(no significant payment) Hillaryland affiliating alike USA government contract after that three-day detention, Mr Jen-F Gu of China Trust Bank later came to New York City asked the Federal Investigation Court to release Ms Yang Shru-chen(lee) for the reason that she was a judge at Taipei, but denied by the Federal Investigation Court), the national defense subsidy receiver agent Ms Chen Chu of DPP, and finally the Taipei District Court prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee(hua). All these four recruiting targets were demanded by the DPP governmental official to transfer that 2000 August car accident death case offender, Ms Chen Lee-chuan, to an identity of secret witness to the petty-theft case of the French Mall of March 2000, under the Taipei District Court governmental witness protection. In such case, the agency money funnelled to Prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee(hua) by the CIA agenct contract while telling the prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee(hua) that it was an FBI contract to sign, obviously was a bribery in return for the car accident death case dismiss Taipei District Court ruling. Such a bribery from the American lawyer to the Taipei District Court prosecutor was leading to Mr David Chang, the former Panchiao Military Police Station second lieutenant officer, from 2000 through 2010, since he was thirty years old to forty years old, under a long term military harassement by the National Security Bureau and National Defense Department subsidy receiving agents, almost losing all his constitutional rights.

The first words after Taipei District Court Prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee(hua) signed the CIA contract, or the notified FBI contract, was that, "I did not know they had such a huge amount of contract money return by signing the agency contracts, thereby, their living standard would raise to be more well-off, their personality would be forged to be more fair, their morality would elevate to be more decent."

The USA recruit agency was adapting to the political slogan "Dignity of Taiwanese", said by the former president and Cornell University alumnus Mr Lee Tang-hui in 2001. Another recruiting slogan was adapting to the explanation, "(Signing the contract and receiving the agent payroll money) to make Taiwanese own high social class circle citizens", spoken out by then President Chen Shui-bian of NTU Law School alumnus, and NSB agent Ms Chang Lee-chuan of the Hope Elementary School teacher from Tainan City, which city then President Chen Shui-bian was born. But the NSB agents Ms Chang Lee-chuan and Ms Lin Ya-chuan using the human weakness of the Hope Elementary School teacher, Mr David Chang's mother Mrs Wu Yu-Sing, anxiously wishing the antipsychotic drug intake son to have a love match and a marriage, through the elementary school teacher network to arrange for a false love match blind dating to conduct their supervisor Mrs Wu Shru-chen's anonymous impeach National Security Bureau mission. The timing was in April of 2000, and after that blind love match dating to complete the impeach evidence collecting requirement to the petty-theft case, taking a military aggressive behavior toward another male NSB agent who had a prostitute transaction with agent Ms Chang Lee-chuan in that earlier winter, just right before the president-elect Mr Chen Shui-bian took his president office oath and got an election invalid polling which was called out by later People First Party chairman Mr Soong Chu-Yee. Ms Chang Lee-chuan and Ms Lin Ya-chuan of Hope Elementary School teacher in the first blind date of April 2000, asking the 1994 military open house Panchiao Military Police Station second lieutenant officer Mr David Chang if he remember that American girl sergeant Ms Eva Ivory who served at the Sang-chuang Military Police Station, and expressed their disagreement to the provocative words of that American girl Ms Eva Ivory for teasing the size of secondary sexual characteristics of Taiwanese to the NSB agents, and therefore was the common enemy of all NSB agents. Finally in the restaurant near Hope Elementary School for the blind love match dating, they had a quarrel replying to the air to cry out that although they had such an attitude toward USA Sgt. Ms Eva Ivory, the suicide case in 1994 August was not related to them because actually that still had quite a long distance between their attitude and what really killed Sgt. Eva Ivory. From this quarrel replying to the air in the restaurant, the context which the case dismiss decision of the car murder case ruled by Taipei District Court Prosecutor Ms Chen Shru-lee(hua) of the NTU law school alumna, and later the judicial process to turn Ms Chang Lee-chuan of that car murder offender into a new identity of secret witness under governmental judicial protection, as to the motive of the law concept it was apparently lacking of the element what Justice required.

When Mr Stephen Young(Yang) of AIT came to Taiwan to report his post as director in 2007, I was quite informed of that the revenue of local McDonald's in Taiwan partly allocated to the above high class agents payroll in Taiwan area. It was after the Twin Tower #79 McDonald's near my house at Panchiao City closed with the Bill Clinton's suggestion that Mr David Chang all you had paid would go into raising those agents who offended you. Former President Mr Bill Clinton and the Yale lawyer hindered me from going to dine at the McDonald's for my own benefit! Mr former President Bill Clinton finally answered my noisy dispute to the air by saying that the USA had deserted you, Mr David Chang, and you would be more wise and having dignity and possibly better off to act as a so-called "rebellion", not to dine at the USA fast food restaurant, McDonald's. But I had a CUNY Baruch College Business School Organizational Behavior program to give me a lesson, having a "diversity" concept beside my social security number getting from Brooklyn Borough in 1996. To dine at McDonald's is my own business, sir.

Best Regards,

Panchiao Citizen David CK Chang,
F121485303,SSN057864042,
November 23, 2010,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

Translated by DB, Dec. 21, 2010, National Central Library, Taipei City

Chapter 26「 重振雄風」--比爾‧柯林頓傳

Bill Clinton: An American Journey, Great Expectation, Nigel Hamilton, 2003, Random House
Chapter 26, 重振雄風, Page 362, Page 365, Page366, Page 373, Page 375


1. 根據1980年11月選舉之夜到州長官邸的年輕褓姆所說的，州長那時候躺在大廳的地板上扭動身軀、腳踢、尖叫，而且像嬰兒一樣大喊大叫。比爾覺得被拒絕，而且幾個星期之內就會被逐出官邸，就像以最年輕的美國州長當選人那樣子，他即將成為最年輕的被罷黜的美國州長，僅僅做了兩年的任期。


2. 雷根(Reagon)的意識型態信念在於鬆綁和取消對資本主義的政府管制，政策設計來使整體美國經濟陷入泥淖的引擎重新自由運轉。事實上美國的經濟也依照規劃中成長。但是另一方面，這樣的政策造成腐化與鬆散的會計制度，鼓勵像吉姆‧麥道格(Jim McDougal)這樣的數以千計的投機者，大量利用羅斯福經濟蕭條時代的一般民眾基金，進行詐欺的經濟犯罪，在阿肯色州代表性的白水案(Whitewater)，雖然貸款取消政府管制是共和黨的最愛，但只有民主黨員會被起訴。在同時，前州長比爾‧柯林頓先生，對麥道格所使用的無窮盡重復擔保抵押進行貸款，來維持少量投資的白水案免於破產的方法，所知道並不會比聯邦銀行(federal bank)或是貸款審查員還多，卻對經濟商業滄桑的興趣樂此不疲，不管出於好意(well-meaning)的朋友吉姆‧布萊爾(Jim Blair)怎麼敦促他都沒不會更改。


3. 邱吉爾的書中的一張扉頁：
失敗對任何人都是很難承受之輕。良心謹慎的威廉‧傑弗遜‧柯林頓(William Jefferson Clinton)嘗試研讀世界偉大政治家的傳記，像是邱吉爾(Winston Churchill)這樣的偉大政治家；從邱吉爾的書中拿掉一張扉頁，不可能使比爾拿筆寫美國政治發展大格局的評論作品嗎？連最需要的阿肯色州歷史與男女著名政治人物，都可以使比爾‧柯林頓獲益良多，尤其在認識人名這方面來說確然。約翰‧甘迺迪參議員的「勇者的畫像(Profiles in Courage)」一書，在1957年獲得普利茲獎(Pulitzer Prize)的傳記類獎，這些都有助於比爾‧柯林頓的政治形象，以及阿肯色州、南方各州，甚至全美國的聲望提高。對於感覺到的拒絕與受傷，也有治療的效果，對34歲的比爾有好處。


4. 但是比爾很明顯的對法律本身沒有興趣。他從未審判過任何案件，也未曾提告起訴過任何案件，他也沒打算要去做這樣子的事。他想念那公家的轎車和司機、公家的食物和清掃的僕人，還有一班幕僚隨時對他的靈感進行政策規劃、他的魅力、他的自尊驕傲(his amour propre)...還有愛(amours)。在小岩城的法律事務所萊特(Wright)、林賽(Lindsey)、詹寧(Jennings)，比爾甚至還必須自己做影印的工作。在這樣的情況下，擔心的希拉蕊再度把莫理斯(Dick Morris)召喚來小岩城，因為身高而很受傷的紐約策士莫理斯，發現前州長先生因為必須住在小房屋和必須自己洗衣服，因為幹了兩年的州長住慣官邸而大發牢騷。最令策士莫理斯感到悲哀的是，比爾‧柯林頓無法從自己的失敗中汲取任何個人的教訓，他僅僅認為自己把連任競選「搞砸了」，並非是像他們所要求的需要做個成熟的人或什麼的，如果說他想要再回到政府部門做事的話。


5. 在文件上聽起來似乎很聰明，但是平行模仿是錯誤的，隆納德‧雷根(Ronald Reagon)先生想要很聰穎的證明這一點；領導力(Leadership)，雷根了解這一點，就是真正擁有能力在各種優先順位做出決定，在罩著無袖外套斗篷之下毫不動搖的在上面做決策制定，然後選擇高效率人士去確實將這些決策與決定順利完成。


DB, SSN057-86-4042,
December 21, 2010,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

司法信箱：民眾的司法權利主張與民主政治下的自由概念

收信日期： 099/12/17 @ 12:43
收信單位： 司法院
姓　　名： 張朝凱
電子信箱： chaokai_chang@hotmail.com
電　　話： 89529809
意見標題： 民眾的司法權利主張與民主政治下的自由概念
意見內容：
敬愛的司法院長賴浩敏先生：

在1996年紐約市(吳姓)市議員，華裔(台灣裔)，在1996年8月8日之前大約是8月2日開學日前後(在開學日之前有在皇后區寄宿家庭自修大學用書微積分與統計學及經濟學教科書)，觀察準台北市長夫人吳淑珍女士，操作使用日本機器帳號(機器硬體設置於美國本土或是日本國境內；據1994年8月之前台北的公開交談訊息資料，吳淑珍女士是從國防津貼雇員陳菊小姐獲知日本管道機器租賃掮客公司的)；(吳姓)紐約市議員觀察吳淑珍女士騷擾紐約市立大學商研所台籍研究生張朝凱情形，(吳)議員批評吳淑珍女士在紐約市這樣子的行為，在台灣算是長期侵犯人權或是成年研究生的民權；在陳水扁準台北市長7月至8月從華府參訪返台述職後，與彰化憲兵特勤隊陳菊女士(8月9日出現在台北榮總)，以後備軍人義務役軍官自美國召回名義，醫院加護病房颱風天二週內將我祖母張王密以蓄意醫療疏忽致死，進行的是政治干預行為；在1996年8月9日之後，該紐約市(吳姓)市議員仍舊進行觀察輔導CUNY Baruch College研究生張朝凱的商研所課業，遭批評為無能力幫助台灣來的弱勢學生，反而造成該台灣學生在台親人死亡的重大權益損失，一直到張朝凱研究生1996年10月22日遭重度能量騷擾輟學離美返台，未再發表與紐約市立大學台籍研究生的人權或民權之相關意見。

民主政治制度之下的政府權限，是依照政治分權制衡與限制政府權力的精神去設計的，包括行政權、立法權、司法權的三權分立架構(中華民國憲法第二條的主權之實質內容)；因此在1994年夏天，匿名之國防津貼雇員陳菊女士對入營服役的交通大學應屆畢業生張朝凱，形同以軍刑法騷擾加以憲兵隊武裝軍事組織進行軍事管制，迄今2010年滿40歲，當時陳菊助理小姐告知板橋市民眾張朝凱義務服役少尉軍官在營自稱嘉義人，必須屬於吳淑珍女士的民進黨所管制，與陳菊前吳淑珍國會助理告知的(忠誠)反對者立場(對抗國民黨與政府司法權者)，也就是報章雜誌上美國國會長官後來所謂的(Rebellion)反對者概念，謂之交通大學畢業生拒簽國防軍事合約的退伍反抗者人生規劃；但是我們按照其他美國民主政治的個人主義的相關思想，飽受軍事侵權騷擾的交通大學畢業生張朝凱，陳菊國防助理小姐所謂的反抗者人生規劃並不是唯一選擇，我們可以借用工業革命之後所謂資本家對政府主張的「自由」的意識型態概念，藉以遠離政治是非與明哲保身，也就是民主政治下民眾的自由(Freedom)概念。

敬祝 時祈

板橋市民眾 張朝凱
F121485303,SSN057864042,
December 17, 2010,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

司法信箱：民事賠償提議法律分析(2006送達台北地院劉亭柏附件)

收信日期： 099/12/16 @ 13:26
收信單位： 司法院
姓　　名： 張朝凱
電子信箱： chaokai_chang@hotmail.com
電　　話： 89529809
意見標題： 民事賠償提議法律分析(2006送達台北地院劉亭柏附件)
意見內容：
敬愛的司法院長賴浩敏：

板橋市民眾張朝凱自2004年起迄今2010年於國家圖書館，亦即前身中央圖書館處理入館民眾遭侵權案件，在先前提交的1994年8月14日美籍依娃中士(Sgt Eva Ivory)北投區墜樓死亡案之外，在1994年8月15日時間相同於前身中央圖書館內另有一加拿大籍的白種女性於軍事演習人員管制機構1994年7月底至1994年10月初，在館內廁所抗議自殺身亡案，於文件一併提交；據在下所知館內駐警隊是以1994年通報美國國會參訪代表遭拒作為存檔說明。

相關法律與條文分析，在憲法第2條主權屬於國民之條文違反部份，因為民眾在司法權一項內容遭到outlaw;若相關政府權威者另行引用民法的第149條，為主管國防需求徵兵進行辯解，同時對國民特定對象之權益進行不法侵害，主張為防衛自己或他人之權利或國家安全者；另外以民法第150條為自己或他人生命、身體、自由或財產上急迫之危險所為之行為；參考美國總統從未簽署日內瓦協定(Geneva Protocol, 2007 International Herald Tribune)，在遭受侵權民事求償責任範圍決定上，交通大學畢業生從1993年至2010年長期進行確認上述憲法第2條違反的司法權outlaw verified，為超過16年長期之民眾法律環境上之已確認事實條件，在法律上之前提邏輯推理上可以設成假設(assumption)，並參考於2006年6月板橋文化郵局掛號存證信函第10011號寄往台北地方法院簡易庭劉庭柏法官，附件A4單張有效送達通知之侵權賠償提議基礎試算上，依照戰爭軍事侵權行為之戰俘處理原則，非軍事作戰人員例如協助的立法委員助理、文職公務行政人員、大學學生會代表、公立大學教職員或圖書館員或學生與民眾、非軍事之社會秩序維護武裝人員(警政署台北市警察)等等，包括2004年至2005年於國家圖書館期間，皆可列為非軍事武裝者以民眾身份協助台北地區協助軍事違法侵權的共同犯案者身份，一併納入新台幣2000萬元賠償基數10倍至100倍的民事求償計算範圍者。

在另一方面，在1996年8月的美國紐約市除了民進黨籍吳淑珍與陳水扁的行為之外，在國民黨籍的行政院長夫人連方瑀女士，當時在美國聯邦調查局(FBI)偕同美軍聯合調查小組，包括在台灣死亡的依娃‧愛弗麗中士(Sgt. Eva Ivory)的親妹妹依娃中尉(Lieutenant Eva)與依娃的親生母親，在美國民主政府架構下，要求從台灣到紐約市的政府長官夫人吳淑珍、連方瑀，對分別擁有的小布希公關經理之美商公司銷售機器，對依娃在台死亡案作證；另外形同約談調查當時的德州州長小布希兼任中情局幹員徵員主任，與形同約談調查美國總統第一夫人希拉蕊‧柯林頓女士；在1996年8月2日開學日前後，當時連方瑀院長夫人開口告知張朝凱紐約市大商研所在讀研究生為前板橋憲兵隊少尉軍官，她可以用婦聯會女性長官的名義決定張少尉為作證人，當時我持紐約市立大學(CUNY Baruch)發給的學生簽證，在紐約市並沒有做出任何答應的意思表示；因為依娃的妹妹與母親要求以依娃中士之1994年8月14日軍事信用給付(credit)進行複製名義，再加上連方瑀院長夫人自行決定對德州州長與第一夫人白宮長官1994軍事演習期間在台灣的行為作證的特別狀況，是已知且可以確定的環境條件，可以確定時間發生在後於數十小時之內，我祖母張王密在台北榮總因醫療蓄意疏失死亡。連方瑀院長夫人是否有對(台北)我的父親張正吉取得(作證)的點頭意思表示，必須另外確認。

敬祝 時祈

板橋市民眾 張朝凱
F121485303,SSN057864042,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

交通大學電子學成績用於傳遞年齡資訊用途

1986-1993年，哈佛大學台灣校友會之權限:

海山國中三年級至建國中學一年級15歲-16歲;
台灣地區5年內哈佛大學申請就讀候選人資格決定：
﹝台北市與台北縣二名國中畢業生其中擇一之行為﹞；
對於未獲青睞青少年後續學校生活影響說明：

0. 小學一年級生張美玲為台北縣候選人之妹妹，
在6-7歲年齡(1977年)放棄讀書機器資源為公開已知事實；

1. 建中1986年新生入學地理科競試成績與後續地球科學成績過低，
學生生活讀書規律作息遭強制更改，
為1977年觀察張美玲放棄機器資源之相同事實；

2. 建中圖書館事件(包括台北市警察局處理但未登記，
加拿大籍與英國籍青少女因建中圖書館事件發生之抗議自殺案，
(為國民黨馬英九先生聯絡駐華代表處外事科處理案件)，
與未設代表處蔣芳良女士協助處理前蘇俄之俄羅斯青少女自殺案)；

3. 與比爾‧柯林頓(使用羅伯‧柯林頓之名片)前阿肯色州長見面後，
(美國醫療器材計畫博士班輟學生張榮國副教授)之電子學成績接續56分與60分，
告知為訊息傳遞功能(出生年份確認訊息，後者為哈佛大學校友會所排除申請人選)。

4. 嘉義籍讀書機器操作輔導人，簽立美國中情局幹員約遭槍決案，
理由為連線高雄地區同齡學生對民主概念回答錯誤為藉口，
交出蔣經國親授印信予蔣芳良女士，
後續並由交通大學預算經費編列立法委員，
以學生社會地位過低不適合唸書長期進行騷擾，
掩飾該嘉義籍讀書機器輔導人責備交通大學電子學成績，
妨害學生前途做為傳訊用途之事實。


DB, SSN057-86-4042,
December 15, 2010,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

Ridiculous United Nations Human Rights Cases of Taipei

1. Time: 1987 or 1988;
2. Place: (1) the United Nations Headquarter in New York City, assembly session forum; (2) a private house in Taipei County, conducting a UN opinion survey from a distance;
3. People:
(1) David Chang: the UN Abused Case child;
(2) Melody Chang: the sister of David Chang and the dropped-out high school girl when Madam Chiang Soong Mei-Ling was the principal of that Taipei City Private Xiai-Sing High School;
(3) Ms. Chu Chen: the UN Child Abuse Case witness and reporter, previously the student of National Cheng-Chi University, and then the Legislator assistant and also via Japanese authority to be the United Nations office liaison.

4. Case briefing:

In 1987 or 1988, at an assembly session forum of United Nations, in the New York City, Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling was testifying for the human rights or civil rights abuse case which in that violating the rights of a teenager girl at Taipei County who was forced dropped out from high school while Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling was as that high school's principal. That was intended to testify for the medical improper practice of Taiwanese psychotherapy system violating that young girl's civil rights, or human rights, along with the violating from Mr George W. Bush represented USA reading-auxiliary machine company when Mr Bush Jr. served as the public relationship manager, and the UN liaison Ms Chu Chen acted as his colleague at the moment. Ms Chu Chen graduated from National Cheng Chi University(NCCU) who later went to the Congress as the assistant of the Tainan City born Legislator Shru-Chen Wu, when the USA reading auxiliary machine company had bankrupted previously. Another customer of that USA reading auxiliary machine company was the Taipei Citizen Mrs. Fun-Yu Lien, who was also alleged to be involved in this case, for there were only these two machines sold from that USA reading auxiliary machine company at Taiwan. During the assembly session forum, the chairman decided to seek a sampling opinion survey about this testifying case from Taiwanese citizen, from a distance observing...

The United Nations Child Abuse Case of David Chang was happened in 1977, the infant child in the Taipei County Hope Grammar School, was pushed from back to fall down and hit the ground to lose his two front teeth. That was reported by the young Yale Law School student Ms Hillary Rodham. But the rapport between the USA and the ROC was breaking down in 1978, Ms Hillary Rodham then transferred this child abuse case to Ms Chu Chen of the NCCU student who had served as the witness of the abuse child case. Perhaps this young NCCU student Ms Chu Chen had been suppressed by the cruel international political environment, she sort of showing apathy to this UN child abuse case David Chang and his family, in which there were a UN case abused child, an adopted family grown up mother, and a high school dropped out sister.

Back to the 1987 or 1988 United Nations assembly session forum, when Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling making a testifying to the forum and the chairman decided to seek an opinion survey from Taiwanese citizen, in a distance. At Taipei City the United Nations opinion survey call was received by Ms Chu Chen, who seemed to be via the channel of Japanese to assume some privilege to answer that UN call. Ms Chu Chen directly assigned her child abuse case David Chang for the survey, who at the moment attended Taipei First High School, or Taipei Municipal Chen-Kuo High School. Ms Chu Chen obviously set aside some Woman Associate member who reminded her that Municipal Chen-Kuo High School student David Chang was the dropped-out high school girl Melody's brother, which case was under testifying in the UN. Ms Chu Chen said that she was giving this low social class Taipei First High School student Mr David Chang a chance to express himself in the United Nation assembly session forum. But as notified along with this case, it was also said that Ms Chu Chen grabbed this UN survey assignment because she had confidence through the Japanese operating crew and through the Taiwanese partners who were familiar to the machine product, the access to the dialogue content of this child David Chang, which was to be delivered to the United Nations testifying forum, would be more easily manipulated than the access to other citizens. It was only for Ms Chu Chen's own interests to grab that UN survey for manipulating the dialogue to avoid the UN forum testifying accusation of the misdeeds caused by Ms Chu Chen's reading auxiliary machine and membership fees collecting. Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling at the UN forum did not aware that Municipal Chen-Kuo High School student who offered the survey opinion was exactly the brother of the improper psychotherapy system victim and her high school dropped out girl Melody Chang. The survey opinion offered by this high school student David Chang, he did not know what authority had such an opinion for submission and he did not know what authority would review this opinion and what action would followed this survey. Under such double-blinded condition, this high school student David Chang of that medical improper practice case Melody Chang's brother had a submission to say that country girls such as his sister Melody Chang who went to Taipei City and studied in the city public library(which David Chang referred clearly to the National Central Library, located at #20 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei City) would surely suffer the attack from the urban discriminating activists to suburb residents. The Taipei First High School student David Chang also mentioned in the UN opinion survey that such discrimination and harassing attack from the urban activists to the suburb residents was including the discrimination to where his sister Melody Chang was born, the southern Taiwan Chia-Yi City.

Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling after half an hour started getting to know this Taipei Municipal High School student arranged by Ms Chu Chen to take the UN opinion survey for human rights violation under testifying, was exactly Melody's brother David Chang. Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling seriously told this young Taipei First High School second grade student that she had a very important meeting in the UN assembly forum, and "your opinion would be hindering Madam her business and against this nation's interests or our common interests." But the psychotherapy process of his sister Melody Chang and the local politics dynamics had made this David's heart hardened, David did not want to change his opinion. Therefore, Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling asked Taipei "to take care of this opinion delivered from such Taipei Municipal High School student." This anonymous reporting task from some United Nations office was received by Ms Chu Chen through the Japanese authority to be as a liaison. Ms Chu Chen quickly reported her former victim of UN Child Abuse Case the high school student seventeen years old Mr David Chang, to be the new "Provocative Trouble Maker" in the new United Nations file, sir.

When Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling realized hours later that this David Chang who delivered the survey opinion was exactly the brother of Melody Chang, the victim of her human rights case under testifying in the UN forum, Madam Chiang demanded the Taipei Woman Associate office to recover the report previously sent to the United Nations liaison office. Ms Chu Chen was apparently expressing her unwillingness for cooperation with the testifying Madam Chiang. Because that was only against Ms Chu Chen's business interests of the reading auxiliary machine and membership fee collecting. That was a huge interests.

To replace the previous Child Abuse Case of six years old infant David Chang, the new United Nations files of seventeen years old high school student David Chang were kept in two parts separately: one filed by Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling, testifying to the UN assembly forum for improper psychotherapy system human rights violations; one filed by Ms Chu Chen, secretly through Japanese liaison channel to the United Nations office, for the seventeen years old "Provocative Trouble Maker." Because the files were kept separately, the activists of interests group from United Nations Health Organization system would harass that "Provocative Trouble Maker" high school student David Chang, while the activists of interests group from the abuse child case or reading auxiliary machine membership system, would harass that "Madam Chiang's high school girl" Melody Chang of David Chang's sister. Therefore, such a human rights filed case of United Nations would have two pressure groups exerting their force upon the very "Low Social Class" family members, a well meaning United Nations case to the brother and sister but finally violating their human rights and civil rights separately. In which case the "low social class" rhetoric was dubbed by Ms Chu Chen when the UN opinion survey was conducted. That is why such a well meaning civil rights case or human rights case through these years becomes so complex and so ridiculous.

David C.K. Chang,
SSN057-86-4042,
December 10, 2010,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

可笑的雙重壓力聯合國人權檔案

民權案相對關係人：
1. 張朝凱: 1987, 1988年建國中學高中生；
2. 張美玲: 台北市私立再興中學輟學生；
3. 陳菊: 台北市吳淑珍立法委員助理與國防部津貼給付雙重身份，
經由日本相關的管道，原先即為聯合國辦公室的聯絡回報員；


事件與案件內容敘述：
在1987年或1988年紐約市的聯合國大廈，
蔣宋美齡夫人在大會的一個assembly session forum，
對台灣的醫療體系精神科的民權侵權做證，
是對於設籍台南的吳淑珍與陳菊(小布希擔任經理的美商公司同事)
與設籍台北市的連方瑀的讀書機器對幼兒侵權行為做證，
在會議當中聯合國的議會決議連線台灣民眾尋求民意的抽樣...

在1977年台北縣幼童牙齒遭蓄意撞落的受虐兒案，
是耶魯法學院的希拉蕊‧羅德漢小姐回報的，
在1978年中美斷交後，
希拉蕊小姐在台灣找了受虐兒案件作證人，
即政治大學校友陳菊小姐接手，
但是因為受國際政治環境影響，
年輕的政治大學學生陳菊也許受到國際上政治壓抑，
對案件當事人受虐兒童並不是那麼友善；

再回到剛才提到在1987年、1988年蔣宋美齡夫人在紐約市開會時，
聯合國大會會議中決定連線台北市尋求民意抽樣調查，
台北當時是由陳菊小姐在台北接聽並且直接找她手上的幼童受虐兒案主角，
不顧其他婦聯會人員告知兩人兄妹關係，
堅持說要給這個受虐兒案當事人一個表現機會云云，
其實是讀書機器長期可以做部份控制意見提交的內容，
是私心讓已經唸台北第一高中建國中學二年級張朝凱接受聯合國的民意抽樣調查，
據悉當時在紐約的蔣宋美齡並不知道是醫療人權案的張美玲的親哥哥接受意見抽樣的，
在聯合國意見調查者對於意見抽樣者身份未知條件，
與接受意見抽樣者對意見抽樣主導者權威未知與意見用途未知的雙盲條件下，
當時台北市第一中學建國中學二年級生張朝凱，
開口就告知台北縣民眾到台北市中山南路20號的中央圖書館，
台北市的騷擾者本身就會進行侵權(意見內容為台灣籍台北縣學生在台北市遭歧視，
即居住在台北縣的嘉義出生鄉下小孩到台北市的圖書館會被無理侵權)

蔣宋美齡在意見抽樣後約半個小時時間，
才瞭解到是再興中學輟學當事人張美玲的哥哥，
在這段期間嚴肅的告知她人在美國紐約聯合國開會，
告知回報身份建國中學學生這樣會影響她處理的事務，
並且「要求台北處理這個發表意見建國中學的學生(原始訊息內容)」，
最後檔案是由台北的受虐兒案的回報人陳菊接下聯合國匿名任務，
將這個年方17歲的前受虐兒身份的建國中學二年級生，
另外回報與撰寫了一個稱為「挑釁聯合國權威的麻煩製造者檔案」，
當蔣宋美齡半個小時之後要求台北婦聯會追回這個陳菊回報的檔案時，
已經無法得知是回報那個聯合國長官與辦公室，
找到的回報人陳菊應該是對婦聯會表明不願配合，
因為蔣宋美齡擺明要處理她們的公開招募會員與收費讀書機器，
因此陳菊對於其經手的受虐兒案，毫無考慮受虐兒家庭本身權益，
一個養女母親、一個醫管輟學高中生、
與一個聯合國案受虐兒的法律利益與權利，
根本只是運用來做為她所抽佣的讀書機器用途與政治傾軋工具罷了！

因為檔案回報做分開存檔處理，
聯合國醫療體系的權益保護人馬，
會從蔣宋美齡夫人的存檔過來騷擾建中學生張朝凱，
而在另一方面原先的受虐兒案存檔的權益保護人馬，
又會從陳菊回報的存檔過來騷擾蔣宋美齡校長的再興中學輟學生張美齡，
從而造成一件聯合國管制的受侵權特殊情況家庭，
從國際上的聯合國方有兩派的壓力團體，
從建中學生17歲時開始，
持續騷擾侵權兄妹雙方至建中學生40歲，
是此民權案複雜度提高的其中一個重要關鍵環節。

David CK Chang, SSN057864042,
December 8, 2010,
National Central Library,
Taipie City

我與比爾柯林頓先生的午餐約會

http://davidjerry.multiply.com/journal/item/79/Having_Lunch_with_Mr_Bill_Clinton_1990

我與比爾柯林頓先生的午餐約會, 1990
Having Lunch with Mr Bill Clinton, 1990


I met Mr Clinton at a restaurant around NTHU at Hsin Chu City in 1990.
在1990年新竹市清華大學的對面的簡餐店我遇到柯林頓先生，


He gave me a business card titled "Home Delivery, Robert (R.C.) Clinton".
他給我一張印有「快遞到府，羅伯先生(R.C.)」的名片。


From his 2005 May autobiography "My Life", paperback edition,
我從他2005年5月平裝本英文自傳「我的人生」中，


I found out that there is a picture of his grandfather in his grocery store in Hope, Arkansas.
找到了一張他祖父在阿肯色州希望市所經營的雜貨店的照片。


Therefore, that was Mr Bill Clinton for sure to give that name card in my sophomore year of NCTU in 1990.
因此可以確定是比爾‧柯林頓先生在我交通大學二年級時給我名片的。


We mentioned the privacy intrusion issue and my sister Melody Chang during the lunch in 1990.
我們在午餐的約會中提到了隱私侵權問題，還有我那被騷擾的美玲妹妹。


Mr Clinton told me that he wondered if that was a financial issue.
柯林頓先生告訴我，他認為我所說的其實是家庭經濟上的財務問題。


I answered him that was not, but a reputation issue instead.
我回答說那並非缺錢的經濟因素，而是名譽問題。


He quickly said some law terminology and glanced at me, which words I did not grasp very well.
他快速的唸了一串法律專業術語並抬頭望了我一眼，我並沒有抓到他所說法律術語的任何涵意。


Once he said we could be partners but soon he denied the chance.
他表示我們可以合作處理這樣的法律事務，但是馬上他就否認有這樣的可能性。


He told me that he graduated from Yale University.
他告訴我說他是耶魯大學的畢業生。


I said that I did not know this university, but I had a Yale key in my pocket.
我說我不知道耶魯大學，但是我有一支耶魯商標的鑰匙。


Then he said that he had investigated the environment around my house at Taipei County.
然後他說他已經對我的板橋住家附近的環境做了詳細的調查了。


What he said shocked me for a while.
這句話讓我吃了一驚。


Mr Clinton said Melody Chang's problem out of this island was a colony.
柯林頓先生說張美玲(我的妹妹)的問題與所謂的次殖民地文化有關係。


At that moment I expressed disagreement.
我當時表示不以為然。


"You could go to find assistance from Madam Chiang Soong Mei-Ling."
「你可以去找蔣宋美齡夫人協助你的問題。」


"And we could be partners!"
「然後我們可以成為這個法律案件的夥伴。」


"People would discriminate you when you seek Madam Chiang's help."
「如果去找蔣夫人幫忙的話，會遭到當地民眾的歧視的。」


"Discriminating Madam Chiang Soong Mei-Ling?"
「歧視蔣宋美齡夫人？」


"I might sue you with this discriminating."
「我可以因為你的歧視行為，在法律上將你起訴。」


"Who are you!(who do you think you are?)"
「你以為你是誰啊！」


"I was an Attorney General...a prosecutor...a judge..."
「我是前任檢察總長...檢察官...一種法官...」


"Really?"
「真的嗎？」


"Yes, I was."
「是的，我曾經做過檢察長職務。」

After leaving the restaurant, Mr Clinton answered the lady.
在午餐約會之後，柯林頓先生訊息回覆婦女會人員。


He would go to Taipei City visiting other law or business university students.
他說他要到台北市去找其他大學法律系或商學系的大學生合作。


Because this David of engineering could not comprehend the English he had said.
因為這個大衛聽不懂他說的英文。


He seemed to show great respect for Hillary's(Rodham) mother Dorothy at YWCA at Taipei City.
他似乎對台北市基督教女青年會希拉蕊的媽媽桃樂絲很尊敬。


He said that was of good manners gentleman should be.(Be polite to women, although they are short.)
他說在禮貌上紳士風度應該要如此。﹝對身高矮的女生表示客氣與禮讓。﹞

David CK Chang, SSN057-86-4042,
December 5, 2010,
National Central Library,
Taipei City

普通竊盜案適用準強盜罪之辯護(刑法第100條？)

知識問題  david ( 研究生 4 級)

普通竊盜案適用準強盜罪之辯護(刑法第100條？)
 

某私人產業所有者之律師協助刑事偵查普通竊盜嫌疑犯A與嫌疑犯B，

嫌疑犯A與B在警察筆錄或調查文件中皆否認B嫌對A嫌之竊盜案知情，

(例如B只是在某種條件下案發當日與A同時到達屋主建物附近的情況)；

另外就私人產業所有者律師對B嫌的刑事起訴文件所稱共同正犯情形，

是提到產業所有者當日有看到A嫌跟B嫌，
A嫌進入產業內偷竊， B嫌在私人產業之外(律師稱為把風)遭業主攔下卻被A嫌喚走，「A嫌犯在前面抱著贓物，B嫌犯在後面急著要走」的案發情況描述。

若普通竊盜案嫌疑犯B之律師提出刑法第23條出於正當防衛進行辯護，
私人產業之提訟律師則將普通竊盜案件條件
以閉路攝影機、人證未明做申述，
假設只是為了變更罪名為準強盜罪，或是另以恐嚇罪另外論罪，
對於以司法改革或是司法紀律要求的環境條件下，
應該如何以(匿名但聲言為美國國會長官建議) 刑法100條 條文進一步提出辯護？

他是他的時代的美麗奴隸！--Bill Clinton: An American Journey

Bill Clinton: An American Journey, Great Expectation, Nigel Hamilton, 2003, Random House

Chapter 25, 最年輕的阿肯色州長, Page 337, Page 342, Page347, Page 351, Page 358, Page 359

1. 阿肯色州長官邸的確是32歲在希望市用鐵道撫養長大的半孤兒的一塊泥磚(adobe). 在1950年代麥可梅州長(Sidney McMath)用前阿肯色州盲人學校(中央街1800號)的紅磚(red brick)建起來的喬治亞殖民風格建築；正面是高聳的白色迴廊門柱，內部則如住家愉悅溫馨。有大理石鋪成地板的門廳，經由螺旋的樓梯而上是州長的私人寓所，但是從大理石地板門廳往左及往右則是狹小的客廳及餐廳，擠滿了從第一任州長以來的古董、繪畫，還有一個1770年代的老爺鐘。客廳再過去是書房，整齊排列著漆成綠色的書櫥，比爾‧柯林頓州長把他快變成古董蒐集的阿肯色州歷史書擺上去陳列，另外再擺上羅斯福總統的半身塑像。比爾‧柯林頓州長在這裡，而不是在國會山莊(the capitol)和他的第一夫人召開法庭(hold court), 或者在餐廳或是食品貯藏間隔壁，是真正的廚房櫥櫃內閣(the literal kitchen cabinet), 在這裡給予私密的一塊用餐區，俯瞰由樹木所遮蔭的州長官邸地產。

2. 在1979年9月大衛營的會議，年輕的柯林頓州長敦促卡特總統投入實施一項能源政策，然後向民眾說明並要求他們支持這項政策。柯林頓先生在小岩城機場告訴記者說：「(卡特)他的政府太退縮、太僵化、太踩高空、太過於涉入每日的管理事務，然後我說他應該把筆記(notes)丟掉，戒掉看大字報提示，對民眾直話直說，就像在州長幹部會議發言那樣子。」在過去有那麼簡單就好了！美國因為要現代化所做的改變，事實上是向後倒退，而不是變成比爾‧柯林頓含糊代表的那種多元種族、多元文化的現代自由民主主義。對尼克森總統進行批評非難的原子塵風暴，暫時阻止了美國向右傾，但是卡特總統踩高蹺的天真，使得潛航的保守派必須浮出水面，使得他們有機會拿魚雷抨擊前任艇長，無情的攻擊善意的這艘州籍的船舶，最後在一任之內弄沉了民主戰艦。而由於比爾‧柯林頓和艦指揮官的緊密關係，與他同在一起的話，比爾‧柯林頓先生驕傲的阿肯色州領導權也會隨之一起沉沒。

3. 同時挑戰競選阿肯色州長的法蘭克‧懷特(Frank White)談到柯林頓：「...但是他向右轉回頭，然後跑向州長的競選，他馬上覺得有了這辦公室的權力，自己是無敵的，他才剛想改變這世界而已；他想自己不能做錯任何事，因為自己是民主黨耀眼的上升明星，當然所有人與媒體都尊敬與愛慕他，所以他做他當時做的事(So he did what he did), 離間那些把他放到現在這裡的那些人，使他們無法去看他而不經過他的幕僚(They couldn't go to see him without having to go through his staff.)

4. 懷特說：「...卡斯楚讓所有人走，他把性變態、精神病患、牢裡的各種罪犯，都倒到美國。我的意思是，那不是自願的，他送他們過來的！於是這些問題一下子變成了我們的問題...」「他們進行暴動...卡特先生告訴我們的。好吧，他轉頭就走，然後派遣了兩架大運輸機(C5As, two big aircraft), 某個半夜載走了幾百人或更多，至於最後那幾個，他把他們送到阿肯色州加菲市(Chaffee)！」

5. ...他們給他更酸的味道，那是他們的支持者之一。對此他們(支持者)覺得他(比爾)應該展現個性(display character)，無論是這樣(更酸的味道)或是另外的(跑堂)那樣(one way or the other)。這些人視(比爾)他為個性優柔寡斷、柔弱、年輕不成熟，然後太過焦慮急欲妥協，以致於不能成為有效率的領導者。記者保羅‧格林伯格在阿肯色州時報週刊上，以「席拉天神對上空洞男人(Godzilla Versus the Hollow Man)」為標題寫道：「柯林頓迷們，這裡有個矯揉的難題(poser)給你們：指導比爾‧柯林頓的政治生涯，除了美國極重要的真命天子之外(political destiney)，是怎麼樣的政治最高原則(political principle)？不限時間回答，因為可能需要花些時間去回答它。」除了柯林頓自己描述「自己是個好人」之外，格林伯格做出結論：「並沒有那原則在那裡(案：雙關語，例如雖然柯林頓看起來有性格問題，並不曾做過原則的相關諮商)。」是個性的關係嗎？比爾不是在黑暗中摸索著路，徘徊於進步與傳統之間、理想與現實之間、企圖心與良心之間，尋找屬於他年代的標記，被上一代領導者強加的戰爭所折磨，魚目混珠以致於在現實的情節中前後的關聯性上，無法美夢成真？比爾州長時期開始的長期助理羅伯茲(Bobby Roberts)可以從回憶追溯中看到這一點，比爾正反映出他的時代(或年紀his age)：「噢，絕對是的；我是說，他像我們一樣，他是他的時代的美麗奴隸！(he's a creature of his time!)」

DB, SSN057-86-4042,
December 1, 2010,
National Central Library,
Taipei City